Buffalo Trace

This is not a post I should have done before, when blogging about the Buffalo Trace Antique Collection Bottle-Share. This is ‘just’ a tasting note for the standard Buffalo Trace bourbon.

Nose:
Quite a nice bourbony smell comes off this dram at first, but just a little sharp. Autumn leaves and tobacco with some sweet tropical fruit. In the background there is thick vanilla, and some citrus.

Taste:
I get a lot of sweetness immediately and to a lesser extent spices. Some pepper but its still quite sharp with a bit more alcohol than is necessary. The flavours do not really overcome the alcohol in this one.

Finish:
The finish feels a bit incomplete. Can’t really put my finger on it but it lacks a bit of maturity. Its pretty good, but not done yet. It feels a bit dusty and dry, and the autumnal notes are there too, but its rather simple.

A nice entry level bourbon, and its far from bad. After a while I think it might get a bit boring. Just something for a dull week night…

Buffalo Trace, 45%, about 25 euros at Master of Malt.

Nose: 7
Taste: 6
Finish: 5
Overal experience: 6
Price/quality: +1

Total: 25 points

3 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

Plantation Rum tasting in Krommenie

Our local liquor shop, Drinks & Gifts, organized a Rum tasting yesterday with 7 rums by Plantation. This is a French company that finds its roots in cognac, but bottles high quality rums as well.

The presentation was given by two very French women from the bottler itself (very French in accent and one of them in the way she dressed. Quite cute). They informed the audience about their company, rum production and regulations (or the lack thereof).

Upon entering the bar we got a sample of a 5 year old Grande Reserva from Barbados. A nice welcom that smelled like some spices, sugarcane and green leaves. Also some very light tobacco in the background. The taste had quite some alcohol and was incredibly sweet and treacly. The finish was more or less the same.

3 stars

After that the tasting officially started, and Anneke and I sat at the bar, next to Tom. Neither of us had much experience with rums, so that made the tasting all the more interesting.

The second rum came from Grenada and was distilled in 1998. Quite a bit older, and since aging in the carribeans tropical climate is very fast, this was more or less a peak age for many rums. The smell was a lot more spicy than the previous one with cinnamon and banana as well. The mouth was quite dry with brown sugar, treacle, a lot of vanilla and some wood. The finish is long and became even more spicy towards the end.

4 stars

The third rum was from Nicaragua and also a 1998 vintage. It had a little more wood on the nose but was not as sweet as the Grenada rum. Some vanilla too. It smelled younger than the previous. The taste was a bit honeyed, sweet and smooth. Some spices showed up later in the flavours. A long finish, but not many new flavours.

3 stars

The last rum before the brake was a Vintage 2000 from Panama. Very spicy and almost no sweetness at first, almost savory like soup or stock. Some confit fruits later on. The taste was dry and quite fierce with vegemite/marmite and some eucalyptus. The finish wasn’t too spectacular. After a while most of the savory smells were gone and a sweeter scent and taste popped up.

3 stars

After the break the heavy hitters were tasted. It started off with a ‘Rum Agricole’ from Guadeloupe. This means as much that it is made from pure sugarcane juice and not from molasses. The scent started very warming and wintry with caramel, and sweet spices. Fresh fruit in the background. The taste was quite fresh and crisp with sugar syrup, grilled pineapple and fig jam. This rum was a single cask bottling from 1999.

5 stars

Then a rum was tasted that, according to some people, was a rum for Islay whisky fans. It came from Saint Lucia and the smell and taste instantly reminded me of anise and some root vegetables like casava and parsnip. It was also quite minty, like mouth wash. This one I did not like at all. Nasty.

0 stars

Barbados 20yoThe last one, was the one we all had been looking out for. A 20th Anniversary bottling from Barbados (that sounded more like I was talking about a hot girl than a rum…). The smell was full on sweetness with heaps and heaps of tropical fruit, caramel and coconut. Mango, papaya, banana were all present. In the finish there was a bit of cocoa as well.

5 stars

The tasting was very very nice and it really opened me up to rum a lot more than I thought it would. Not that I will stop being a whisky fanatic, but there is more than just barley!

Posted in - News and Announcements | 4 Comments

Bottle-Share 3: Buffalo Trace Antique Collection – The Results!

Finally, after long weeks of not getting around to it, I have tasted and reviewed all 5 Buffalo Trace Antiques we samples in the previous Bottle-Share. As I expected by the good reviews they were getting on other websites, the results were quite admirable.

Buffalo TraceUnfortunately, it was not possible to get all 5 bottles of the 2010 releases, so we had to make due with some of previous years. Not a bad thing, since older ones are getting rave reviews as well.

The results:

#5: Thomas H. Handy Sazerac 2010
A terrific nose, but it let me down on the palate. The alcohol reigns and supresses most other flavours. 30 points.

#4: Eagle Rare 17 2009
A very very good bourbon that ticks all the boxes. Nothing to complain about to be honest. Very complex flavours, spices, fruits, creaminess. 36 points.

#3: George T. Stagg 2010
This is a cracker bourbon! Ridiculously high in ABV, but flavours shine through very well. The flavours are not as complex as the Eagle Rare 17 but this is one rollercoaster ride in whiskey. 38 points.

#2: William Larue Weller 2008
William Larue WellerThe wheated bourbon with a rather gentle touch. Quite an ABV to it, but you don’t notice it that much. The finish lasts forever and the flavour is just a combination of lots of tasty things. 39 points.

#1: Sazerac 18
A ‘watered down’ Sazerac at 45% ABV, but still it gives so much flavour. I’d be scared if I could taste this at barrel proof. There is just so much going on that you could do the entire night with just one dram of this liquid gold. I gave this all points I could give, since it simply is the best American Whiskey I have ever had. Ever. 42 points.

And that’s that. The Buffalo Trace Bottle-Share is over. For me at least. I still have about half a sample of most bottles left, so I’ll be enjoying it some more soon. I might have to break the bank and get me a bottle of that Sazerac…

The new Bottle-Share is about to be sampled. It will consist of 8 bottles of the Bladnoch distillery, and their single cask bottlings of other distilleries. The next one will be right after summer I guess, unless I come across something I just can’t pass up…

Posted in - News and Announcements | 4 Comments

Thomas H. Handy Sazerac 2010

The most recent version of the Thomas H. Handy was the one I was able to get for the Bottle-Share, and as I told here yesterday, I owed you a review. I tasted an earlier of this whiskey and was quite, no very, thrilled with it. Some serious alcohol, but in the 2007 version it didn’t get in the way of the flavour.

Nose:
Thomas H. Handy at Master of MaltIt has not as much rye on the nose, at first, as the Sazerac 18, and more a scent of rum. Also milk chocolate, corn syrup. Although there is a very heavy sweetness, it still has some freshness to it, with a thick layer of mint, almost like mouth wash. Lemon cake and later the crust of dark bread.

Taste:
Here you really pick up on the alcohol. This dram needs lots of time to loosen up and, contrary to the previous release of the Handy, its masking the flavours a little bit. There is a lot of sugary sweetness and the mouth feel is very dry. Needs a lot of time to start giving some flavour. There is some pink peppercorn in there somewhere.

Finish:
The finish loses a little of the alcohol burn quickly after which a lot of tropical fruits pop up. Gaining some points here 😉 Mango, papaya, pineapple, stuff like that. Liking it a lot, especially since the rye is still here as well, and some of the spices that go along with it. Some clove at least. Also, some sweet dough and bread.

I’m in a bit of a conundrum (had to google that…) with this one. I absolutely love the nose after it airs a little bit, and the finish is pretty good too. The taste, however, is way too closed off and doesn’t really give me much, flavourwise. So, based on that, a partial fan of the Thomas H. Handy of this year.

Thomas H. Handy, 2010, 63.45%, about 115 euros at Master of Malt

Nose: 9
Taste: 6
Finish: 8
Overal experience: 7
Price/quality: 0

Total: 30 points

4 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 2 Comments

Random Update

Today, no tasting notes for the simple reason that I have not had the time to write them early this morning, and I forgot to take my notes with me…

I decided to write a general update on things happening, whisky-wise at the moment.

Bladnoch Bottle-Share:
The bottles have come in yesterday and are now displayed on my coffee table in the study. I hope to start bottling the samples tomorrow night and will finish that probably later this week. I am also working on the little booklet I usually send with it, and hope to make it as entertaining and informing as possible.

Buffalo Trace Bottle-Share:
Tomorrow I will publish the last tasting note to the Buffalo Trace Bottle-Share, the Thomas H. Handy. That means all notes are online and I will post my personal results, as I have done before, on Friday.

Other Bottle-Shares and Samples:
I have about 70 samples sitting around of which I have not published tasting notes, or which I have not tasted yet. Among them are the ‘Gedeelde Vreugde‘ Bottle-Share samples of The Whisky Exchange’s 10th anniversary bottles and Diego Sandrin’s Laphroaigs which he finished in wine barrels. I will start working on those next week.

Tastings:
Contrary to the last couple of months, I have not many tastings planned in the coming months. My wife is very happy about that, although I already start missing my weekly whisky round-up! I do have a Rum tasting this Sunday in Krommenie and a Mackmyra Twitter Tasting (I refuse to call it a Twasting) on May 2nd. Apart from those, I will lay low on the tasting scene for a while, also to save up some hard needed cash for my trip to Scotland soon.

Festivals:
None planned thusfar. I did decide not to go to Whisky Live NL this year, unless I can get a ticket for free somehow (worked out last year, thanks to The Old Pipe), since I think €45 euros just to enter the festival with very expensive drams on scene is just too expensive. For that money I probably can get samples of most things I like to taste there.

I hope to be able to visit the Pot Still Festival again this year. Its a nice and small festival in Amersfoort, organized by Van Wees, a large liquor shop, bottler and importer of fine spirits. The focus is on all things distilled, so apart from whisky, also cognac, grappa, genever, calvados and so on.

Posted in - News and Announcements | 2 Comments

Mellow Corn

This whiskey came up on Twitter last week, and the general consensus was that its terrible. Now, my point of view:

Nose:
Mellow Corn at Master of MaltSweet and oily corn syrup with an industrial edge. Like someone spilled bourbon on a factory floor. Also a slight hint of raw potatoes.

Taste:
Quite a fierce mouth feel. Some alcohol burn as well but a lot less sweet. Apart from that there aren’t many flavours I can pinpoint. Weird, and quite nasty, to be honest. Like drinking paint stripper without the nasty odour.

Finish:
There is absolutely no development from the mouth, just a continuation of the same boring flavours.

Has this stuff aged at all? It tastes more like it ran off the stills and was bottled. I read some positive reviews but can’t really agree with them. Not much positiveness to find at all apart from 2 things:

1: I can check another whiskey off my ‘101 whiskies to try before you die’ list
2: The dinky yellow label is awesomely old fashioned. Love that.

I guess I’m just not a fan of corn whiskey…

Mellow Corn, 50% ABV, 20 euros at De Whiskykoning.

Nose: 1
Taste: 0
Finish: 0
Overal experience: 2
Price/quality: 0 (its cheap, so no negative mark)

Total: 3 points

0 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

Greenore 15

Greenore. Its an Irish grain whiskey which was in the news a bit last year. It won many prizes and lots of people were very enthousiastic about it. Of course, I am willing to try this kind of stuff, especially if samples are available here or there. I’m also keen on trying grain whiskies the last couple of months. I think it is an underrated type of whisky that has some true gems every now and then.

Nose:
Greenore 15 at Master of MaltLots of vanilla and some crushed black pepper to start off with. Unmalted barley, wet grass and some musty hay as well. There is some freshness in there and its actually pretty good.

Taste:
The mouth feel is very smooth but there a bit of fire. A bit of increasing peppery heat. The dry cereal makes an appearance again with some sugary sweetness.

Finish:
Dry and dusty. It tastes a bit like grist. The vanilla is nowhere near as big as on the nose and a lot of the sweetness has disappeared too.

A bit of an underachiever, in my book. I expected the fragrances in the nose to reappear while tasting it as well. I missed those, almost no vanilla, not as crisp as I hoped either.

Greenore 15, 43%, about 60 euros, samples available.

Nose: 7
Taste: 6
Finish: 5
Overal experience: 6
Price/quality: +1

Total: 25 points

3 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

BenRiach 12 Aromaticus Fumosus

The BenRiach has given its whiskies all kinds of Latin sounding names since they reopened in 2004. This one, as you can guess by the name is a smoky one, and (substantially less obvious) has been finished on Dark Rum casks.

I usually am not a big fan of finishes but there are some true gems hidden out there, which of course makes me very willing to try!

Nose:
BenRiach Aromaticus FumosusLots of prickling smoke, that gets to you right away. The smoothness that usually goes with a rum cask comes quite a bit later when it gets a lot more sugary.

Taste:
The taste is a lot lighter than I expected after the blast of smoke on the nose. Also the smoke is somewhat less obvious. It has some more defined flavours of sweet smoke and heather.

Finish:
It gets fruity at last. Not overly so, but fruity nonetheless. The taste doesn’t really develop but lingers a bit. Does that make for a short finish? Quite sweet again.

I’m not a fan. The whisky, to me, is a bit one dimensional. Some smoke and a bit of sweetness doesn’t make for something great. It lacks in complexity and overal interestingness…

BenRiach Aromaticus Fumosus, 12yo, 46%, about 42 euros at De Whiskykoning.

Nose: 4
Taste: 4
Finish: 4
Overal experience: 4
Price/quality: -1

Total: 15 points

2 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 1 Comment

Tullibardine Twitter Tasting

Yesterday evening, I partook in a Twitter tasting with 3 different editions of the Tullibardine distillery. I only tasted one Tullibardine before and have not even taken tasting notes of that one yet. The evening was a huge success with heaps of tweets. So many, you couldn’t even read them all.

Tullibardine Twitter TastingThe evening was organized by DH17 Slijterijen, the same club that was part of the organization of the Zuidam Distillers visit of last Sunday. They sent out samples over the past week and they all arrived in time. Great organization and kudos to them!

Tullibardine Aged Oak 40%
The nose starts with wet boat sails, wax coats and glue. Nasty to be honest. There is some hidden sweetness and fruit, tinned pears. Some old wood as well. The mouth feel is quite sticky and a bit greasy, strong tea too. With a bit of water it becomes a bit like a fruit infused vodka. Its quite spirity and it tastes young. Also very malty.

2 stars

Tullibardine 1993 Vintage, 40%
The spirity part is gone, which is a good thing. I found it oddly resembling peach cores. Disaronno was what Danny said and that seems fitting. The taste is more fruity as well. A bit more spicy with pepper, some wood and fruit. “Rounded” as some call it. Disgusting term 😉 The finish is still a bit youngish, with little to no wood influences. Soft and fruity but I also pick up some tree bark. Might be cinnamon.

3 stars

Tullibardine 1992-2010, Premier Cru Classe Finish, 46%
Its PINK!?! I only tasted one pink whisky that was any good, and that was the rather terrific Octomore Orpheus. It does not bode well… The scent starts with peardrops and red wine gums. A bit of water brings European oak and some dried fruits. On the palate I got dried forest fruit. A little bitter and quite a lot of wood in this one. The finish has something ‘green’ but that goes away very quickly and gives way to more oak. After a while the winey smell goes away from the nose and a lot more sherry appears. That disappears again after about 15 minutes, and then it gets pretty bad.

3 stars

After tasting these three Tullibardines, I’m not convinced about the distillery. I appreciate that they are a little fish in a big pond and they do what they think is best without compromises, but I have to taste my first really convicing one yet.

In this case, all credits go to Elize and Wouter of DH17!

Posted in - News and Announcements | 1 Comment

George T. Stagg head to head

I still hadn’t tasted the George T. Stagg sample I had from the last Bottle-Share and thanks to Ewald, a fellow Usquebaugh Society member I got samples of the 2008 and 2009 version as well. I decided to put them head to head to see if there are many differences between all the different editions.

George T. Stagg 2008, 70.9%
Nose:
Some tobacco on the nose with caramel, nougat. There isn’t much depth to the nose. I do get some spices like nutmeg and ginger.

Taste:
The taste starts of with some coffee, both in mouthfeel (the dry grainy stuff) and flavour. Also some wood influences, cocoa and a nice hint of chili pepper. Its also a bit more treacly than I expected and grenadine as a surprise.

Finish:
The finish is long, very long. The tobacco is back again, which is nice. It really tastes like bourbon with age, but flavourwise there aren’t many new things happening.

Total: 33 points (available at The Whisky Exchange for 135 euros)
4 stars

George T. Stagg 2009, 70.7%
Nose:
There is some crispness in here along with the wood. Also quite a nutty scent, like roasted almonds. Quite a lot of alcohol to singe your nostrills. Some dry grass and dry spices. It smells a bit like dry Indian spices.

Taste:
The mouth is incredibly dry with ground coffee and lots of pepper. Some sambal and again quite nutty. Very dry.

Finish:
The dryness lingers in the finish, which isn’t too short. Here I find the first bit of sweetness but still not as sweet as I expected.

Total: 33 points (available at Master of Malt for 115 euros)
4 stars

George T. Stagg 2010, 71.5%
Nose:
Very crisp with some light perfume if you breathe deeply. If you just calmly inhale there are more deep earthy smells of cocoa. There is quite some caramel fudge on the nose as well. A bit of fruit as well, but I just can’t put my finger on which kind. Spices appear a lot later.

Taste:
Very dry and dusty with a huge alcohol kick. The crisp and sweet smells of the nose reappear here with treacle. There is also chili pepper and with a little bit of water some tree bark and ginger. Maple syrup as well.

Finish:
The finish is long and fierce with a continuation of the alcohol burn. Here the taste of maize appears with cloying sweetness and almost burnt caramel.

Total: 38 points (available at Master of Malt for 135 euros)
5 stars

Conlusion:
I think there might be some effect of the bottles of the 2008 and 2009 being open for a while and the 2010 having been just recently opened. I prefer the 2010 version to the other two, since I kind of missed the fruits in the earlier two. The balance is a little bit better as well. Only drawback is the alcohol kick, but that can be remedied with some water and that will also bring out some nice new flavours.

So, credits to Ewald for sending a few samples over! Loved to taste them like this!

George T. Stagg 2010 showed some clouds in the bottle which made me think of caramel. I hope it isn’t that but I rather think it is just some sediment from the casks it comes from… Looks interesting, though.

Posted in - News and Announcements | 6 Comments