Armagnac: Two Armagnacs from Chateau Laballe (Réserve and 2006 vintage

When I started going through the Armagnacs from that recent bottle-share, I decided to start with the more recent distillates. On the other hand, I couldn’t wait to dive into the old ones too.

What I did was make a line-up of four different ones. These two from Chateau Laballe (Bas Armagnacs) and two from Saint Christeau, the 1940 and 1987. I’ll review these two first, since those are the ones I started with, and it makes for an easy duo.

Chateau Laballe Réserve, 40%

Sniff:
Quite typical for a young spirit and quite raw. On the nose there’s also something warming and fresh oak. Restrained with hints of butter, chocolate and kork.

Sip:
The palate is sharper than I expected, but that’s more the young spirit than it’s the alcohol. Surprisingly rich, but still spirity with tree bark and, well, heavy. As in, it doesn’t seem to flow easily.

Swallow:
The finish is fruity and spirity. Quite typical of a fruit spirit. Not unlike smooth grappa. Quite short.

Chateau Laballe 2006 vintage, 40%

Sniff:
A lot more oak than the Réserve. The spirity and grappa notes are gone. Light and dusty with nutmeg. More chocolate too, and cocoa and orange oil.

Sip:
A lot more oak than the Réserve. Sharp and quite similar to grain whisky. Cocoa nibs, oak, conifer. Some spices too.

Swallow:
The finish is nice and full. Slightly sharp with alcohol and oak. The fruit is very noticable. Long, with white chocolate, milk and beurre noisette.

So, what did I think of these? The Réserve is in a similar price range as a blended scotch. Its also similar in quality. Not very convincing but very acceptable. It would never convince me to switch from whisky to Armagnac, though. It’s all a bit thin, and unpolished.

The second one is a lot better with far more depth, and far more flavors to be discovered. At it’s price point (just under € 50, I believe) it’s in a rather acceptable single malt bracket. It fits. I think when push comes to shove I might just buy something like this if the choice was this or a, let’s say, Glenfiddich 15.

The combination of white chocolate and buttery fats with the conifer and spices works well and balances nicely.

Still, no reason to abolish whisky, but a nice bit of variety.

About Sjoerd de Haan-Kramer

I'm a web developer at Emakina. I'm highly interested in booze, with a focus on whisk(e)y. I like to listen to loads of music and read quite some books. I'm married to Anneke, have a daughter Ot, a son Moos and a cat called Kikker (which means Frog, in Dutch). I live in Krommenie, The Netherlands.
This entry was posted in - Armagnac, Chateau Laballe and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Armagnac: Two Armagnacs from Chateau Laballe (Réserve and 2006 vintage

  1. Pingback: Baron Gaston Legrand, 1995, 40% (and a wrap up) | Malt Fascination

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s