Hakushu 1989 – The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary

Another bottle from the Whisky Exchange’s 10th Anniversary line. So far, I really enjoyed all of them except for the Amrut. Maybe it was my sample, but to me there seemed something wrong with it…

This Hakushu was one of the first bottles released and it scared me a bit, since the price was rather high. A 20 year old for about € 180 seemed a bit much. But, on the other hand, there aren’t that many rare private bottles from Hakushu.

I normally don’t comment on the color of a whisky, because it usually doesn’t say much, except about the colour. This one, however, looked like coffee.

Nose:
Hakushu 1989A massive amount of wood. This one did not come from wood, it was made of wood, it seems. Grass, pine needles, pine cones and resin. I get the feeling of walking into a sherry wood pine forest. Unripe banana and salty spices. Its an odd one, its rather crisp, but also brutally heavy.

Taste:
Very sharp (no surprise at 62%) but with a flavour explosion. It feels a bit sugary, but again, very woody and rather astringent. Quite viscous as well. There is a sweetnes in there, but the wood trumps it.

Finish:
The finish is nice with lots of different flavours. Wood, again. Spices, again, but also some furniture polish and burning insense.

This is a tough one. At first I thought I really liked it, but the wood impact is a bit too big for me. I think it overpowers most of the other flavours. This one might do with a bit of dillution. But apparently, many other people think it a tremendous whisky.

Hakushu 1989, 20yo, 62%, The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary, sold out.

Nose: 9
Taste: 6
Finish: 6
Overal experience: 7
Price/quality: -1

Total: 27 points

3 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 2 Comments

Shackleton / Mackinlay update

Well, after a few weeks of waiting the bottles finally got in. There were some problems in the Netherlands with there being no importer for a while and the new one taking their time to get the bottles out.

Mackinlay's Highland Malt

Last couple of days I spent making samples and sending them out. Usually that’s not too much trouble but I didn’t have a night available to do all samples at once. And, what doesn’t help was the bottles having to fit through mailboxes and such. I got very good at creating small boxes from larger boxes…

I have no tasting notes yet, but everyone who sent me their address in time and has paid for the sample can expect it to be arriving in a day (or a few, if you’re not in the Netherlands).

Of course, I shouldn’t be swayed by the packaging, but I have to compliment Richard Paterson and his conspirators, because it looks stunning. The box has that ‘polar expedition’ feel and everything looks genuine. Hats off for that!

Posted in - News and Announcements | 3 Comments

Linkwood 1973 – The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary

This is another dram from a ‘The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary Bottle-Share’ I participated in a long time ago. For some reason I never got around to tasting all samples, or lost my tasting notes. Luckily, I still had some of this whisky left to try again.

Nose:
Linkwood 1973A full frontal assault on the nose of woody bourbon cask, to the extreme. Apart from that you get a slight rub of alcohol and paintstripper, not uncommon in long bourbon cask maturation. Mint, citrus fruits with quite some spices like nutmeg. I also get sunseed oil, which is a first!

Taste:
Sharp and sweet. A lot of pepper/sambal in a viscous feel. It feels a bit strange to have that and banana, vanilla, wood and caramel. There’s a lot going on!

Finish:
The finish is very much ‘old whisky’. Very nice with full and smooth flavours. The oilyness I picked up earlier is here too. There’s a hint of coal smoke here as well. Goody!

This is a difficult whisky. The complexity is incredible but there are some odd flavour combiniations going on that I’ve never encountered before. At first I wasn’t too enthousiastic, but now I’d really love another dram!

Linkwood 1973, 36yo, The Whisky Exchange,  49.7%, sold out

Nose: 9
Taste: 9
Finish: 9
Overal experience: 9
Price/quality: 0

Total: 36 points

5 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 5 Comments

A few random beers

Recently I have tasted an amount of beers of which I have already placed some reviews. I did taste some more after that and those reviews will all be below.

De Molen – Lente Hop
This ‘spring hops’ beer by De Molen is an IPA with a slight acidity and maltiness on the nose. Some orchard fruits like apples and unripe pears I get too. The taste is very fresh and not really bitter. Just a tad of sweetness, white grapes, and quite hoppy. Becomes a bit more bitter as it warms up.

4 stars

De Molen – Zomer Hop
The ‘summer hops’ compadre of the last beer. This one is a bit darker and sweeter, but also more hoppy. Like there was more flavour to the hop used. Not as fruity but still quite malty. Milky as well. The flavour has some acidity, quite full bodied, but still rather crisp. Hoppy and malty on the palate as well.

4 stars

Black Isle – Yellowhammer IPA
I picked this one up in an organic supermarket near Penicuik. The nose is rather ‘washy’, quite sour and yeasty with some lemon. The flavour is not really spectacular and reminded me of a hoppy pilsner, not as good as I had hoped.

2 stars

BrewDog – Trashy Blonde
Another IPA by BrewDog, and as you might remember, I kinda like those. This one is quite similar to the blond Belgian beers we get in the Netherlands, but packed with a more intense flavour. There’s a lot of hops present I think and it gives a quite fruity flavour. Rather sweet too.

3 stars

Orkney Brewery – Northern Light
A very clear beer with quite some maltiness. Crisp and a tad sharp, but I like this. The flavour is packed with soft sweet fruits, apricot, nectarine. Quite a summery beer. The flavour is rather full which doesn’t make it a drinker…

3 stars

Flying Dog – Raging Bitch
Raging BitchThe nose hits you, packed with a light bitterness, malt and citrus fruits. Grapefruit is undeniably here. Hops, malt and quite heavy. The massive bottle this comes in makes this a beer of which you drink one. Damn this is good!

5 stars

De Molen – Hout & Hop
This wood aged IPA came in a big bottle too. Something I don’t mind, since it is a very flavoursome beer. Lots of fruit, lots of sweetness, but it never becomes a sweet beer. The fruitiness is countered by the wood flavours and the hops. Very good too!

5 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 3 Comments

A whisky symposium of the KCWS

The KCWS is the King’s Court Whisky Society of which I am a member since a couple of months. Its a fairly large whisky club in Haarlem, which is rather close to Zaanstad.

The symposium was held because of the 10th anniversary of the club and they invited all kinds of Dutch whisky prominents to have a say about what the world of whisky will look like in ten years time, focussed on the Netherlands.

The speeches were held by Ad de Koning (Master of the Quaich), a whisky hero who has been putting single malt whisky on the map since the early 80’s. Ilja Schouten is the brand manager for Macallan, Highland Park and Famous Grouse (among others) from Maxxium. Patrick van Zuidam is the master distiller of the Zuidam distillery. Michel Kappen is the CEO of The World Whisky Index. Thom Olink was the president of the symposium and editor in chief of WhiskyEtc. Hans Bresser was to represent importers of smaller brands and independent bottlers and finally, Hans Offringa shared his views on his area of expertise, communication and press.

Ad de Koning
His talk was mostly about the current trends in whisky, world wide, with a focus on the economics behind it. A slight focus on Japan, since that is a market that mister De Koning has extensice experience in. In short: the volume is going down slightly, except in the new markets but in most countries the value is more or less similar, except in Japan where the whisky market has been in decline since the 80’s.

Patrick van Zuidam
Patrick focussed on production of whisky and stated that the three or four dominant players will be dominant for a long long time. Although them being dominant, the small companies will start to make the most ruckus. They have more room and a larger necessity to innovate. While the rules around Single Malt whisky are fairly tight, the same goes for bourbon but experiments can be done with yeast strains, barley and other grains. Also, he expects more science to be used in cask management. As we come to understand the workings better, there will be more guidance and targeted maturation.

Ilja Schouten
Ilja also focussed on charts and figures and showed a larger overview of the market, without focussing solely on whisky. The blends still make up for about 80% of the domestic whisky sales, while single malt, bourbon and other types of whisky fill in the other fifth. All drinks are in decline since the depression, but there is a certain trend of premiumisation.

Michel Kappen
His company focusses on about 0.2% of the market where the most expensive bottles are bought and sold as investments. He has a vault in which the bottles are stored and the contents vary from just released bottles to the € 50,000 bottle of Springbank 1919. He stated that everybody present will start using The World Whisky Index as an appraisal tool in the coming few years. Quality will be expressed in value more and more.

Hans Bresser
In short, the market for independent bottlers is a tricky one and will start to see less players in the future, since less casks, and lesser quality casks are being released to them. In the world of small distilleries, not much will change.

Hans Offringa
He focussed part of his talk on the whisky literature and development thereof in the past, and talked about the explosion of new media whisky ‘press’ (of which this blog is part). He expects that offline print will start to lose in favour of online print, and more companies will start using both. He also expects that the current explosion in blogs, twitter and facebook published whisky news will decline or at least separate from the professional press.

While I did not agree with all statements made, it was a very interesting afternoon filled with interesting points of view and new insights. I also though it very cool to have finally met Ad de Koning in person. I read a lot about him but never encountered him before. The man is truly a hero and a presence. You just can’t go around him.

The point I disagreed most with is the point made by Michel Kappen. He expects people to express quality in a price more often, but I think that since everything already has a price and people are focussing more on the enjoyment of things (see the quality over quantity shift) I think people will care a bit less about the price of what they are drinking. Of course, many people will buy stuff to sell it in a few years time, but its not the be all, end all. Especially the ‘bottle of Springbank’ case is overrated in my opinion (no, I haven’t tasted it, that’s not what I meant). Its price is said to be 50k, but no-one has ever that much for it. Which, in an auction/index world means its not worth it.

Also I excpect most innovation in the area of whisky to come from America, where distilleries have less problems to name their product differently. “If its not bourbon, we’ll just call it whiskey”. In Scotland I think distilleries are very afraid to veer away from the standard Single Malt, since the reputation of Single Malt is so much higher appreciated than anything else. And, since innovation has been punished in recent years by the SWA, I think people will not go there as quickly. Example: Loch Lomond had been making single malt for ages and now they can’t call it single malt anymore, since they use the wrong stills.

To make us happy campers during the talks we were handed a sample of the KCWS club bottling, a 20  year old Tamdhu from 1989. Tasting notes will follow.

All speakers brought an affordable dram that they highly enjoy, but since I was driving I only had one. Patrick van Zuidam brought a cask sample of his distillery. A 6.5 year old Rye whisky at approximatly 57% ABV.

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

A visit to DH17, Bergen op Zoom

Last Friday, I finally went to pick up the Mackinlay’s Highland Malt bottles for the Teeny-tiny Bottle-Share. For those bottles, I drove to Bergen op Zoom to see what the DH17 liquor store was all about, since I had never been there before.

I met up with Elise, the owner, and we had a cup of coffee and talked about the whisky business for and hour and a half. About new releases, planning of those releases, importers missing opportunities and about DH17 becoming a new Ardbeg Embassy. I really had a good time! I got to taste the new Arran Sleeping Warrior, which is a very nice Arran bottling, with a sweet edge because of the wine finish.

The shop itself must be the most spacious liquor store I have even been to. Its very ‘freshly’ decorated with more than enough room to wander around and a good eye for the feel of the shop. Not cramming everything in there that you can get hands on but a good selection of everything they sell. No beers though, with a very clear reasoning behind it: “I want to be a specialty shop, and since I barely know anything about beer, I can’t give specialty advice on it. Therefore, I don’t sell beer”. Sounds solid to me.

The whisky selection had another angle than I am used to as well. You can’t find a bottle of every brand or distillery you’ve heard of at DH17. But what they do sell is a massive selection of regular and rare bottles of the brands they love. Ardbeg, Arran, Tullibardine, Benromach, The Ultimate, Douglas of Drumlanrig and a rather large supply of ‘off the beaten path’ bourbons.

They even had a Benromach from 1981, of which I might just be tracking down a sample to see whether I want the whole bottle for my birthday 😉

I might just be finding myself on their website a tad more often than I used to! A bit of feeling with a shop is very important, to me at least. I prefer to know who I’m buying from and like the people. In this case, there is another shop added to my list of ‘whisky favorites’.

Posted in - News and Announcements | 2 Comments

Ballantines from the 1950’s

No one knows exactly when this bottle of Ballantines was produced, but the bottle is from around 1952. Since everyone is always saying that old blends are better than most single malts are now, I thought it a good idea to try some.

The only hint of its age is on the label where it states that the brand was established in 1827 and it has been in use for over 125 years. A quick sum makes this whisky from at least 1952. The ad on the website says 1940, however.

Nose:
Ballantines 1940A typical ‘blended’ scent to it. A lightness that you don’t often find in single malts. Some cereal, a little wood, old lemon, malt. Slightly floral with some heather. Nothing too spectacular.

Taste:
The flavour profile is very light with a hint of cardboard. Again rather floral with a slight touch of wood and lemon.

Finish:
The finish is much longer than I am used to from these entry level blends. Much, much better than current Ballantines with a full creamy feel to it.

I expected much more of this. Of course, not every edition can be great but something this old should have had a bit more body to it. Or at least, that’s what I was expecting. This is a bit of a friend to all. Not spectacular.

I heard, after tasting this, that most Ballantines from BEFORE the 40’s are much better than the ones from after. Apparently there is quite some knowledge about these old spirits to be found…

Ballantines +/- 1952, 40%, 2.5cl samples available at €8.50 at Rare Whisky Site

Nose: 4
Taste: 3
Finish: 6
Overal experience: 5
Price/quality: 0

Total: 18 points

2 stars

 

 

 

 

Posted in - News and Announcements | 2 Comments

Old Mork 1916-1933

Until I saw a post on the Usquebaugh Society forum about Old Mork bourbon, I had never heard of it, and as it turns out that’s not really strange. Old Mork was a ‘medicinal purposes only’ whisky distilled by distillery No. 17 in Louisville Kentucky.

The sample I bought is from a bottle distilled in 1916 and bottled in 1933. An 18 year old bourbon, from almost a century ago. I just had to get myself a sample of it, and it wasn’t even too expensive!

The math doesn’t make sense. 1916 to 1933 can’t be 18 so some info on the label is wrong…

This review will be seriously biased, by the way. The simple fact that this was distilled before even my grandfather was born made it just too incredibly cool to be ‘objective’.

Nose:
Old Mork 1916Warming with spicy caramel and butterscotch. Grilled fruits and a certain soupy scent. There is a floral hint as well, I think I am getting burdock.

Taste:
The feel is quite fierce initially, but the flavour is quite smooth. Quite some wood and spices with cinnamon.

Finish:
The finish just screams “BOURBON” at me. Everything you expect from a good one is in there and it lingers for a long long time. Wood and just a little bit astringent.

The flavour is a little thin, the finish a bit better. The nose, however, is nothing short of sensational. Truly a gem!

Old Mork bourbon, 1916-1933, 50%/100 proof, 2.5cl samples at €12.40 at Rare Whisky Site.

Nose: 10
Taste: 7
Finish: 8
Overal experience:10
Price/quality: 2

Total: 37 points

5 stars

Slight update: A post by Chuck Cowdery on 30 June 2014 explained the brand a bit and it appears to be called Old Mock instead of Old Mork. Read more about this here.

Slight update #2: The front label apparently says ’18 summers old’ instead of 18 years. This could be correct if it’s distilled before summer in 1916 and bottled after summer in 1933. That would make it 18 summers old, but 17 years. Clever Americans!

Posted in - American Whiskey, Stitzel Weller | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

The World’s Best Whiskies by Dominic Roskrow

The second book review on my blog! In October of last year a serious amount of whisky books was released. This one and Dave Broom’s World Atlas as well as the annual Malt Whisky Yearbook and Whisky Bible. I hadn’t gotten around to reading this one, but I finally did last week. Here’s what I think:

The good
The World's Best WhiskiesRoskrow’s writing style is very easy to read so you fly through the book. He also has taken time to write (rather short) articles on distilleries, which more often than not are a fun read instead of boring statistics and dates. The start of the book is very much oriented at beginning whisky fanatics with notes on the different kinds available, as well as general terminology and a ‘how to taste’ bit.

The bad
The list of ‘750 essential drams from Tain to Tokyo’ makes no sense at all. Of distilleries that have not produced many great whiskies there are many entries. And yes that is opinion, but in this case, the averages don’t work. A couple that stand out: 11 Arrans, 16 BenRiachs (recent ones, not the ones from the seventies), 11 Benromachs compared to 5 Bowmores and 2 Broras and 1 Rosebank. It just doesn’t add up (well, it does, to 750…).

Also, in the introduction there’s a line or two on why independent bottlers are not included (highly limited turn-outs and such), but there are single cask releases by distilleries themselves which are just as limited. The one entry that stood out most was the Cougar bourbon. This one is only in there because other people said it was great. However, its long gone (limited release issue?) and Dominic hasn’t tasted it for himself.

Conclusion
The list is more like ‘what-official-bottlings-have-been-released-over-the-last-few-years’ than anything else. In my opinion, and also when I browse around the internet to view the general consensus on whiskies there are many classics missed and some utterly obscure and unpopular bottlings have made it in. The redeeming factor of this book is the witty writing style that I really enjoy and therefore I warrant it a star. Only one, though.

1 star

The book is available through all major book sellers for about €25 and up.

PS: on that Cougar thingy:
Apparently its a Bourbon, distilled by Foster’s, the Australian beer brand. For some reason it still makes an appearance in the categories USA and Rye! WTF?

Posted in - News and Announcements | 5 Comments

3 Celebratory Ardbegs

Yesterday was the 14th rebirthday of Ardbeg distillery. On June 20th, 1997 they started distilling again at the iconic Islay distillery and that had to be celebrated!

While I haven’t been the biggest fan of some recent bottlings (Rollercoaster, Blasda) there have been some tremendous drams in the past. Of course, ancient Ardbegs from the 70’s need no introduction, but since my wallet strongly disagrees with them, they won’t be part of my collection anytime soon.

Ardbeg Uigeadail 2005, 54.2% (from the Peat Pack)
The nose starts with salt and ash, dried grass and heather. There is lots of light and old smoke as well. The taste is sharp with fierce stinging smoke, a slight creamy texture with lavender and heather. The finish isn’t too long and not much new happens. Just before it fades a massive note of burnt wood and charcoal comes by.

I thought this was the 10 year old, didn’t read the label very wel… I barely picked up some sweetness of the sherry cask. This might be because I have had the sample half empty for a year or two, but it surprised me. Still a very good Ardbeg nonetheless.

4 stars

Ardbeg Renaissance, 2008, 55.9%
Lots of smoke, strong ashy notes, but this time accompanied by some vanilla sweetness. Does get a bit stale after half an hour. The palate is sharp with heathery flowers, smoke, salt and sand. Also some dry peat, but a very beachy feel to it. The finish is exactly what I expect from a 10 year old Ardbeg, and given the cask strength its even stronger.

I completely forgot about this bottle. Not that I didn’t remember about buying it and not finishing it yet, but the quality is something that eluded me. I bought it in a time at which I wasn’t overly enjoying peaty whiskies I guess. Anyway, this one’s back!

4 stars

Ardbeg Corryvreckan, 2008, Committee Bottling, 57.1%
Ardbeg CorryvreckanThe nose starts of rather smooth, but Ardbeggy. There is some chardonnay thing going on, sweet white wine. Also a tad salty and sharp in the back of your nose. The taste is dry and chalky with a heap of pepper and warming peat smoke. In some way this still feels like a light whisky. The finish has some vanilla, a tad sweet and not as sharp as the others. Very, very nice!

5 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 2 Comments