Homebrewing so far

Cocky Rooster BrewingI have been brewing my own beer for about half a year now. The idea behind it was to create something. To make something out of materials and be happy about it. So far I’ve come to a varying set of conclusions.

I like creating beer. It makes me feel cool that I can go in the shed and see a stash of beer that’ll last me the better part of the coming winter and everything that comes before it. I made that!

The brewing experience is somewhat dampened by the fact that home brewing mostly consists of putting syrup in a bucket and topping it up with water. Of course there are some tweaks and you have to add water, sugar and yeast in certain amount and a certain way. In one case I had to boil the hops first, but that was it. Kit brewing is something that gets boring quickly.

The next step is to go to malt extracts, hops and recipes or toy around with the kits. That’s where I am now and my first extract batch failed horribly. I still have to throw it away. I will bottle some of it to find out what something so foul smelling tastes like. Experience is key.

The British style beers (apart from Stout) are all quite similar. So far I’ve made a Scottish 80 shilling ale, an IPA and a Barley Wine and I can’t even tell the latter two apart. Maybe I chose the wrong kits, but I’m not overly fond of the ones I had. The Belgian kit I had was also a tad similar to the barley wine but more bitter. Only the Stout stood out. That still is my favorite beer.

For the coming batches I will try to make a regular beer first in small batches. No special stuff going on, just to see how it’s done. I’ll make small batches since extract is pretty expensive and I don’t want to throw away € 100 because I fuck up a couple times. I also have to work more organized since I sometimes make a mess of everything. That was probably the reason my beer went bad. That, and the fact that it’s very hard to cool it down quickly. I might have to get myself a wort cooler.

And the final conclusion: Bottling is, by far, the worst part of home brewing. I still haven’t found the most practical way of doing everything and after I’m done the kitchen looks like  a beer-bomb exploded. There has to be a better way.

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

Millburn 1974-2000 – Blackadder Raw Cask

Blackadder is one of my earliest ‘favorites’. Nowadays it has declined in personal popularity for a number of reasons. One of them is that the bottlings are very good, or heavily alcoholic with loads of heat and ethanol. I’m not big on inconsistency, especially when bottles are in the Blackadder price range.

Millburn is a closed distillery in Inverness which has been converted to a restaurant. It was never a really big distillery and there aren’t many bottlings around. Also, I don’t think Millburn was one of the most reliable brands to buy, based on what I have tasted. Let’s see what this one brings!

Blackadder Millburn 1974-2000

Image from Whiskybase.com

Nose:
Alcohol. Ethonal. Lazy cask? Very spirity for a 25 year old whisky. Some vanilla but not as much wood as I expected. Grass, flowers, egg scales, dust, lemon and gives dry straw after a while of sniffing.

Taste:
Razor sharp. WAY too strong in alcohol. Very, very hot. Thick vanille with a drop of water. sand paper, saw dust, aceton. Becomes a bit softer if you let the water and whisky marry for a few minutes and then becomes very sweet. Vanilla candies or something.

Finish:
Cloying vanilla sauce. Creme brulee. Again, hot chili peppers and not much wood. Fairly long and very degreasing.

This one is one that falls in the way-too-alcoholic category of Blackadders. Not my cup of tea because I also find it way too sweet if I water it down a bit. I sometimes have the idea that Blackadder has two people who pick casks and who have very different tastes.

Blackadder, 1974-2000, 25yo, Blackadder, Cask #4616, 58.5%, € 150 at Whiskykoning.

2 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 1 Comment

Longmorn 1968-2003 – Scott’s Selection (USA)

A very well aged version of a Longmorn bottled for the USA market. Apparently there have been a couple good ones for the USA since this is the 3rd one I’ve tasted that trickled back to Europe.

Nose:
Longmorn DistilleryFull frontal fruit and resin without being completely overpowering and not too heavy either. Quite waxy with a very decent dollop of wood. Apple, a hint of cinnamon, licorice root but a hint of glue as well.

Taste:
Pretty sharp but that’s no surprise for a 35 year old whisky that’s still at 61% ABV. Again, not too overpowering. Vanilla, honey, wood, bees wax. A very nice balance and very full flavoured. Quite creamy too like pastry and vanilla cream.

Finish:
The finish isn’t too long and offer mostly the same as the palate. A little bit spicier with ginger. Mostly waxy, resin and wood.

To be honest, I love this stuff. I like whiskies that are quite waxy and resiny. A bit dirty, so to say. Of course, there’s the danger of them becoming gluey, but this one just shies away from that. A very different kind of old Longmorn that the more fruity ones that are available, but very much in line with some of the Gordon & MacPhail ones from last year.

I just found out it’s a bourbon cask and that explains quite a lot. It was very dark for a bourbon cask, though.

Longmorn 1968-2003, 34yo, Scott’s Selection, USA market, 61.3%, € 135 but LONG gone.

5 stars

Posted in Longmorn | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Ainslie’s Royal Edinburgh Choice Scotch Whisky

That’s a mouth full! A miniature of a blended Scotch bottled in my year of birth. That’s the only reason I picked it up. Usually I’m not a big fan of blended Scotch and while that sounds very arrogant, it’s mostly because I find them overly complex and my palate is not sharp enough to pick up all the nuances. Especially since there aren’t many higher proof blends I find most of the flavours too gentle and subtle to make a proper guess to what it all is.

I have absolutely no clue to what Ainslie’s is in regards to other blends and blenders, but tasting notes can be made, of course!

Nose:
Ainslie's Royal Edinburgh Choice Scotch WhiskyVery gentle and smooth with quite a big dollop of sherry influence. A touch of oak, soft peaches, nectarines and apricots. Loads of flavour. Not too complex, but very good!

Taste:
It almost tastes like liqueur, with a gentleness like this. Quite a bit of honey and lots of yellow fruit. Some sweet cereal and those white-yellowish Caramac bars. Some cinnamon and maybe a slight hint of cloves.

Finish:
The finish is very simple again with just a huge amount of tropical yellow fruit. Quite short.

If you take a big sip you get some more spices like pepper and a bit more wood too. Otherwise it’s just very, very gentle overall. A very nice blend with lots of sherry influence. I think this one would support the point of old blends being better than quite a few single malts from today.

Fun Fact: This Royal Edinburgh whisky is from Glasgow.

Ainslie’s Royal Edinburgh Choice Scotch Whisky, 40%, 5cl, bottled on May 14th 1981

3 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

Whisky Castle – Smoke Barley

That’s one of the strangest titles ever to start a whisky review with. It says absolutely nothing, apart from the smoke thing. Anyway, Whisky Castle is a Swiss distiller from Elfingen and they’ve been producing whisky for a couple of years now. Releases haven’t been sizeable, especially not for from the distillery and the only way I got my hands on a sample was by ‘accident’ when I received some Douglas of Drumlanrig samples from Elise van Tol, of DH17 fame.

I also think the price tag on each bottle doesn’t really help them, since their drams start at about € 96, for the 3 year olds.

Nose:
Smoke BarleyYou smell right away that it’s only about 3 years old. Very youngish, spirity with sharp smoke. Very flat too with not too many things happening yet. Firewood, vanilla, pepper and ‘old gin’.

Taste:
Very thin again with some vanilla and spices, mostly pepper. Slightly smoky, wood smoke instead of peat.

Finish:
Short, as I expected with such youngsters. A very slight smoke and pepper revival before disappearing completely.

I think this can be described as promising, but I think it needs about a decade more to start being complex enough and pick up enough from the wood to loose the young taste and scent. The smoke is almost tanglible on the nose and much less so later on, which makes me believe in the ‘too young’ bit even more. For now, boring and mostly fun for visiting a distillery if you happen to be in Switzerland.

Whisky Castle Smoke Barley, OB, 43%, cask 481, € 96

1 star

Oh, and a tip for Whisky Castle: Get an English version of your site up, please!

Posted in - News and Announcements | 1 Comment

The Blog Birthday Bash #2

Pulled PorkLast Friday this wee blog turned two years old. I find it very surprising that I kept it up this long and that so many of you are reading my ramblings, but so far there is a slight growth every few months. Of course, this being the summer everything in the hard liquor industry turned down a notch, but in general, the amount of hits and searches is growing.

To celebrate everything that has happened I hosted a very informal barbecue and whisky tasting in our backyard. Partially at least because right around dinner time there was a huge down pour so we had our Pulled Pork inside and went back out for booze.

Personally I thought the atmosphere was terrific with all kinds of people mixed up and mingling. My only fear is that the more thoroughbred whisky connoisseurs expected more whisky oriented conversation. Since there were some relatives and (non-whisky) friends this might not have been the case.

Big PeatThen the whiskies! There were highs and there were lows. One of the biggest surprises of the evening was the Big Peat. One of the most awarded whiskies to be released in 2010 I found it rather sharp and very youngish. Maybe because I have not been enjoyed peated drams like that for a while, and I might have to try it again in winter.

What turned out to be on the table (properly wrapped in aluminium foil) was everything from 7 year old Clynelish to 34 year old Millburn with a Springbank Open Day bottling, a G&M Elgin-only bottling of Inchgower, the always terrific Glengoyne 17, and a rare St. Magdalene sherry cask!

InchgowerI tried to plan something bigger on a very short notice which didn’t work. I will probably try again next year with a bit of a delayed party right after summer when everyone’s back from their vacations.

So, Ronald, Martijn, Henk, Henk, Helen, JK, JP, Tom, Jantien: Thanks a million for a terrific evening. Most of all, though, thank Anneke for being terrific in helping out preparing everything, being pregnant and all. I have some making up to do, I think!

5 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | 3 Comments

Best beers of July

I almost forgot about this monthly post! I will get around to posting about the Blog’s Birthday Bash next time, but I don’t have the pictures in yet, and this one had to happen anyway!

Sharp Pants – Struise Brouwers/Three Floyds
Shark Pants!A very flavoursome ale, but with a label like this I expected all aromas and flavours to be a bit more in your face. Good stuff nonetheless!

4 stars

Sint Amatus – Struise Brouwers
Same as above. A rather bold take on a classic Belgian Style brown ale. Big flavours and great balance.

4 stars

Libertine Black Ale – BrewDog
Although I don’t really take to black ales, this one had enough hops and packed enough punch to get over that.

4 stars

I Hardcore You – BrewDog/Mikkeller
A twist on BrewDog’s regular Hardcore, but I think I like this one better. It doesn’t have as much ‘potato chips’ flavour in it as some other double IPAs.

4 stars

Chaos Theory – BrewDog
A great dry IPA. A very herbal and spicy version on the American style IPA.

4 stars

Dead Pony Club – BrewDog
Why it’s called California Pale Ale is a mystery, but it has some similarities with Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, and Punk IPA. I love this style!

5 stars

Dog ADog A – BrewDog
Well, my other favourite style: Stout. This was an absolute stunner almost on the same level as the Tokyo. Packed full of flavour with an incredible sweetness that is very soothing. Never overpowering or anything!

5 stars

Not too many different beers, but a nice overview nonetheless. I got a big parcel with all kinds of BrewDog stuff I had been saving up across the North Sea, which is why I tasted so many of them. The Struise beers was a slight remainder of what I picked up in Brugge, last month. I’ve been getting back to whisky more and more so I might not have too much on the list the coming few months, but I’ll post anyway!

BrewDog for the win!

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

2 years of blogging!

Today, this wee blog is up and running for 2 years. Of course, this has to be celebrated and that will happen tomorrow with just short of a dozen people, pulled pork and booze.

Time for some statistics:

  • Total hits: 52,986
  • Average per day: 72 visitors
  • Current average of 2012: 90 visitors
  • Number of posts: 546
  • I’ve lost count of all reviews, but I’ve tasted at least some 500 whiskies since I started and the counter is way over a 1000 in total.
  • Most popular search query: Gold Label, Sjoerd Whisky, Glenfiddich Snow Phoenix
  • Most popular post: IPA is dead. Long live IPA! (yes, a beer post).

I’ve recently decided to not blog every day. It’s not that I don’t want to, but I just can’t find the time between major home improvements, work and all other things going on at the moment. I might be able to pick it up at some point, but for now there will be a few posts per week.

A funny thing is that it doesn’t seem to matter for the popularity of the blog. That, of course, might have to do with the time I spend on each post. I’ve written some more articles that weren’t tasting notes and I like the way that turns out. I feel that’s the way to go for me. Tasting notes, information and opinion.

Apart from that, I have no idea what’s going to happen in the future apart from the fact that whisky is and will be my favorite tipple, with beer as a close second. After that absinthe, rum, jenever, calvados, gin and the likes. Apart from absinthe there’re not many grape based drinks in there. I plan to average on some 175 posts per year, which is still more or less one every two days.

#1 dram I’ve tasted since blogging: BenRiach 1975 for Asta Morris. And for some reason I’ve misplaced my tasting notes so no review of that yet.

Posted in - News and Announcements | 3 Comments

Glenrothes 1990 – SMWS (30.63)

Some random SMWS sample I still had lying around without having a clue what the distillery is. I like such surprises but for some reason my mind saves all the data after it’s had one dram of a certain distillery so by now I can name quite a few of their numbers.

The color on this one was quite luscious orangy brown. Very copper like which looked quite appealing.

Nose:
GlenrothesVery, very fruity sherry with loads of tropical fruits. Fresh, dried and tinned with syrup. Quite sherry like as well, but not overpoweringly so. I even find a slight hint of smoke, with some smoke and wood too. Juicy plums, peaches, figs, banana, apple, grapes and some mint and anise.

Taste:
A little sharper than I expected of the gentle nose, and slightly dry as well. It doesn’t power down on the fruity theme, though. Juicy again right after the initial dryness. Red chilis, crushed black pepper, wood, spices and boat loads of flavour.

Finish:
A long finish with the same fruits as on the nose, with loads of spiciness.

Unfortunately for Glenrothes, this continues the theme I usually have with them: The independents are better than the OBs. There will of course be exceptions but most of them fall in line with previous statement. Anyway, I absolutely love this dram and wouldn’t finding a few bottles of it here and there. Long gone though.

Glenrothes 1990, SMWS, 30.63 ‘Turkish coffee in a barbershop’, 55.8%

5 stars

Posted in - News and Announcements | Leave a comment

Bourbon vs. Scotch

This week on Twitter I made the rather bold statement that I think standard Bourbons are generally better than standard Single Malts. To back this up, I feel I have to write a little bit about it. I should start by explaining what I consider standards in both categories.

Mortal KombatA standard bourbon is an easy to define but limited category. In my opinion I’m qualifying the lowest priced distillery named bottlings. Four Roses, Wild Turkey, Maker’s Mark, Buffalo Trace, Jim Beam. They all have a bottle out there that is a regular bourbon, no small batch, no limited edition and it carries the distillery’s name. The same goes for Scotch. The standards there are very similar to categorize, but there’s just a LOT more. I’m talking Glenfiddich 12, Bowmore Legend, Highland Park 12, Laphroaig 10 and so on, et cetera.

I came to this conclusion after about a decade of drinking whisky: I really enjoy most of the standard bourbons and became a bit bored with the standard Scotches. This might sound like I’m really spoiled, which would be true. There are exceptions of course. I really don’t like the Jim Beam white label. And then there’s Lagavulin 16. But still, in general, I’m much happier with a glass of Wild Turkey 101 of Maker’s Mark than I am with Caol Ila 10 or Auchentoshan Select. Even when I consider the fact that in standard Scotch there is a load more choice (100 distilleries to a handful big ones in Kentucky).

If you take one step up from standard editions and go into the € 50 range you can start to count independent bottlers, NDP (non-distiller producer) and products with different names (like Jim Beam’s Knob Creek). Things are very different and much less clear here. In this category I think the balance is about even. Luckily there recently have been some very decent Scotches for very decent prices (Auchentoshan Valinch comes to mind), otherwise bourbon would win out on price/quality here too.

The premium category is mostly depending on decent pricing which in my case (in Europe) is easily won by Scotch. It’s not that bourbon, rye and other American products are absurdly priced, but they are if you start looking what they cost in America: Sazerac 18 at $90/100 to € 140 ($ 172 at current rates), Eagle Rare 10 at $ 25 ($ 50 in NL).

What is a very deciding factor in this equasion is the sheer variety in Scotch that is available here. You don’t want to drink the same booze every day and the fact that I usually don’t mind spending a tenner more to get in the not-so-standard-category of limited editions. I have noticed that, in general, I have started buying more non-single malt products over the last year. So, after all is said and done, it seems variety is still king!

Posted in - News and Announcements | 4 Comments