Investing in whisky

Whisky is made for drinking. That’s the statement that should be here in regard to investing in whisky, or any other kind of booze for that matter. That is, according to a lot of whisky geeks out there.

On the other hand, I also know of a lot of guys who claim this, but don’t really shy away if someone offers them € 400 for their Ardbeg Supernova Committee release. Of course, there are some who are adamant in their beliefs, and make a point of opening the bottle just so it loses its value. I even planned to do that with my bottle of Bowmore Devil’s Casks batch 1.

Of course, I have not. Not yet at least. I still mean to drink it but since I have way too many bottles open as is, I am postponing most bottle openings until a later date.

Back to investing in whisky. A minor disclaimer is necessary: I don’t invest in whisky. I buy only bottles that I intend to drink. However, I buy more bottles than I want to drink, or open. This means that a sizable and growing chunk of my collection is still closed and stored, and whisky being whisky, it’s also increasing in value in a lot of cases.

The drawback of buying bottles that you’re not opening is that some of them were purchases in the heat of the moment. At a tasting, or after hearing a lot of raving reviews, or as a pre-order. Sometimes a bottle that seemed interesting loses its edge for you. If you don’t taste before buying but you do get the chance to try it before you’ve opened it, it might not be all that.

I’ve noticed that in the period I bought quite a few more bottles than I’m doing currently, but had already stopped opening them right away, some of them lost interest for me. In other cases, where a bottle was quite limited, like the aforementioned Ardbeg Supernova for the Committee, I didn’t like it all that much but had bought two. Also from Ardbeg, I bought two Alligators and didn’t like it when I tasted it at a tasting a couple of months later.

It just so happens that in those cases the bottles became worth much more in the following months and years and I don’t feel any shame in selling them on at significantly inflated prices. 

Does this make me invest in whisky? I don’t think so, but these experiences have made me change the way I regard my planned purchases. For example, when Glenfiddich Snow Phoenix came out, I had the idea I would enjoy it, but with it’s proposed limit in availability, I bought two. Just in case. Two options of course: it’s bloody good and I want two for myself, or it’s not that good and I can sell one on.

Maybe that makes me an investor in whisky. Maybe that makes me just a clever buyer. I should be clever in buying whisky, mostly because I messed up in some other cases where my hobby never held any value (buying the wrong Magic cards, Dungeons and Dragons books, comics, cds, and so on).

The guys at Just Whisky Auction wrote some articles on how to go about whisky auctions and buy clever, but I didn’t really like where the articles went. I learned how auctions work, but you can just as easily check eBay or watch a couple episodes of Auction Hunters on TV.

For the Dutch audience: On the website of Whisky Etc. an article was just published by Bert Rutkowski of Eetcafe Pretzels fame which does hit the spot regarding investing in whisky with a limited budget. It can easily be read as a guide to buying cleverly with what you have not losing value.

Just keep in mind: Whatever you buy, you can always drink it. So buy you would like to drink if the market slumps!

Oh, and on a side note. I decidedly do NOT sell bottles that other people have done me a favour with. As in, keeping one back before it went on sale, setting me up with a contact, getting me a good price and such.

Posted in - News and Announcements | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Laphroaig 15, 1998-2013, 60.8% – Signatory Vintage for The Whisky Exchange

Apparently I was wrong about the amount of samples of bottlings for The Whisky Exchange I had lying around. The mistake was made when I only counted samples that TWE had sent me, instead of just all of them.

This one was sent to me by my whisky buddy Ben Cops, who I got to know through the bottle share group of which I used to be a member. The reason I’m not a member anymore is that I needed to protect myself from ‘smaller’ expenses that racked up to significant amounts.

Anyway, I have the feeling I haven’t been giving the Islay whiskies enough attention lately. Also, The Whisky Exchange bottled a significant amount of Signatory ‘vases’ last year, and I didn’t taste any of them, which I regret. This puts some of that to rest, since it’s one of them.

Hint for anyone buying these bottles: They go well as water bottles during tastings and dinners.

Laphroaig 15 for The Whisky Exchange

Laphroaig 15 for The Whisky Exchange

Sniff:
Kaboom! It’s heavy and peaty right of the get-go. Medicinal and salty, with a certain harbour scent of ropes, ships and fishing nets. Some asphalt too, creosote maybe. In the background there are raisins and minor hints of other dried fruits.

Sip:
The palate is very sharp with the typical Islay smokiness of smoke, peat, heather and a hint of salinity. The oak is slightly bitter, but also sweet. Quite heavy with dates and apricots.

Swallow:
The finish is pretty peaty again, with smoke and oak. Slightly bitter too and hints of sherry. It mellows rather quickly, and is a bit more gentle than I expected.

Apart from it being a Laphroaig bottled for The Whisky Exchange I didn’t know anything about this bottle at the time of tasting, and the sharpness, and most of the flavours are pretty easy to explain by checking their website. Refill sherry, at a whopping 60.8% ABV do the trick nicely.

Then, what did I think of it? Simple. It’s awesome. This is a very impressive drop of booze from the guys in the south of Islay. The flavours are typical and Islay-y and the only complaint I might have is that it’s not such a typical Laphroaig where I usually get more lemon flavours and other citrus fruit. On the other hand, if a whisky is this awesome, who am I to start nagging about minor details.

In short. It’s great. If you have the budget, get one.

Laphroaig 15, 1998-2013, 60.8%, refill sherry cask 700393 Signatory Vintage for The Whisky Exchange. Available from The Whisky Exchange for £ 99 / € 125

Thanks for the sample, Ben! Yours will be on their way soon.

Posted in Laphroaig | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mortlach 1995-2013, 18yo, casks 4079+4780, 46% – Signatory

Mortlach. The distillery that might have gotten the most flack from the blogging community, and raving reviews from the more professional media outlets this year. Their newly released range is pricy but supposedly good.

An easy Google query can get you all the info on their new range you need so I’m not going into it here.

This bottle comes from Signatory’s 46% range. This range is not really a blind spot on my radar, but I don’t encounter them all that often. I’ve tried a few bottlings over the years and I can’t remember ever being truly thrilled by one. Most of them feel a bit below par by not being cask strength.

I think it’s the case with almost all ranges from bottlers that are not at cask strength, but I always get the feeling that this is second choice and has therefore not been bottled in their cask strength series. This might be a bit cynical, but in the few whiskies I’ve tried from this range, I’ve not been proven wrong in a memorable way. Of course, I bet people who’ve been at it more intensively or longer than I have can instantly rattle of some great ones, but I can’t.

Anyway, Mortlach is cool. Their whisky is cool. It’s one of a kind, which I find very important in a dram. It has to add something to my collection if I’m buying it. Let’s get to it.

Sniff:
It’s heavy alright. That’s a start. That’s what you expect. It has a scent of beef char on a barbecue. There’s vanilla and white oak too, with some mild peppery spices. It feels much stronger than 46% and based on the nose alone I’d have said Cask Strength any day.

Sip:
The palate is rather gentle, but after a few seconds a peppery coarseness sets in. It feels almost gritty. There’s a hint of vanilla, and a lot of oak. Some herbaceous flavors too, which goes well with the beef char that’s present here too. Not sweet at all.

Swallow:
The finish is easy going with very similar flavors to the palate. Quite oaky to an almost bitter level. Medium long and tasty.

Well, that ‘rant’ I started with should be corrected now. This is a great dram in its price bracket. I’m not always a fan of bourbon matured Mortlachs since the sweetness of the spirit can overpower the wood for a long time, to a level that you think you’re drinking liquid pear drops, and only that.

This one is not in that category and Signatory have chosen two good casks for this bottling and if you think this sets you back some € 45, AND that it’s still available, you’re golden. This is one to look out for and I keep reconsidering my self imposed promise to not buy anything for a while (like I’ve done SOOO many times before).

Mortlach 1995-2013, 18yo, casks 4079+4780, 46%, Signatory Vintage. Available at DrankGigant in The Netherlands for € 45.50

Thanks for the sample, Shai!

Posted in Mortlach | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Widow Jane corrections

Right, after some discussion regarding today’s review of Widow Jane bourbon, it appears I have fallen for the PR crap that is their website. (‘They’ is the Cacao Pietro Distillery in New York City).

It appears they are currently distilling a bourbon in New York City, using the mine water they so heavily promote. On their website they show the label of their straight bourbon distilled on site.

However, before someone starts compiling another comment telling me I suck, the sample I was given was from a different label, stating KENTUCKY bourbon. Apparently, this whiskey was distilled in Kentucky, and sourced by Cacao Prieto Distillery. They then used the mine water to get it to bottling strength.

So, for some reason the distillery’s website doesn’t say anything about them sourcing the whiskey. Even if you read their press releases they already state that their seven (now eight) year old bourbon is made in NYC.

It seems they are going to some lengths to hide a lot of details. Even on the website of the Brooklyn Chamber of Commerce I can’t find any data on the distillery. Not by category, address or product do you get any data. The Yellow Pages gives you no results either. Strange…

After some more digging I found a label of a whiskey they produced stating it’s ‘Wapsie Valley bourbon’, and Wapsie Valley seems to be in Indiana, so that’s something different again.

It seems people more knowledgeable than me on American Whiskey know this. It’s strange though, that I can’t find any information on the initial release of Widow Jane, but on a site not related to anything whiskey there is a short report and a picture from 2010 stating the distillery is still under construction.

I knew there were some distilleries trying to hide the fact that they’re sourcing their whiskey, but this seems to be taking it rather far.

Posted in - American Whiskey | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Widow Jane, 7yo Straight Bourbon Whiskey, 45.5% – Cacao Prieto Distillery

A seven year old bourbon from Brooklyn in New York City. When I first read that sentence, my thoughts were “New York my ass, they just sourced it from Heaven Hill or MGP or so. It turns out that it’s not.

Cacao Prieto Distillery

Cacao Prieto Distillery

The Cacao Prieto Distillery is situated in the Red Hook area in Brooklyn, which makes it another urban distillery, just like House Spirits of which I reviewed a Single Malt recently.

The people at the distillery are very proud of their water source, which is the Widow Jane mine in Brooklyn, which is dug in limestone bedrock. Limestone just happens to be the kind of stone the Kentuckyans are proud of and to which they attribute a lot of the greatness of their whiskey.

The distillery also produces a lot of chocolate and chocolate related stuff, since the owner is from the Dominican Republic and sources a lot of organic cocoa beans there.

Anyway, a 7 year old whiskey from a distillery I’ve never heard of. There are quite some surprises left in the world. I thought I’d at least heard the names of distilleries producing whiskey that have been around for a while now. In America that might not be as ‘true’ as in Scotland, since there are so many small distilleries with really limited output…

Widow Jane 7yo Bourbon

Widow Jane 7yo Bourbon

Sniff:
Gentle and crisp with some slate, sweet corn and a touch of oak. Not as oaky as I expected though. Smooth and rich, but not heavy. Corn bread, some peppermint.

Sip:
On the palate it’s initially thick before a certain minerally flavor sets in. Slate and chalk, but not metallic. It’s sweet but not overly so. There’s some chili pepper going on, and dry oak. It’s very thick, almost like syrup. Vanilla custard maybe, and this may be suggestive, but the website talks about cherries and I think I agree.

Swallow:
The finish is more typical of bourbon with lots of sweet corn, syrup, oak and a drying feeling on your tongue. The finish isn’t too long, but it’s tasty and that’s what counts.

Cacao Prieto advertises this as a seven year old sipping like a 20 year old. I disagree since this is by no means as woody as those ‘over aged’ bourbons are. It’s not an overly complex dram, but it is a very good bourbon. While I can’t be sure, it might just be that the minerals on the nose and palate are from the limestone from which the water is drawn.

In short, it’s a very tasty bourbon. Not overly complex, but simply very tasty. I’m positively surprised and I just added a new address to the to-do list if I ever make it to NYC, which has been in a ‘we have to go there with the two of us’-phase for years now. Having kids got in the way.

Widow Jane, 7yo Straight Bourbon Whiskey, 45.5%, Cacao Prieto Distillery. Available at selected retailers in the USA for some $ 50-55. So, it’s not cheap…

Thanks to Shai for the sample!

Posted in - American Whiskey, Cacao Prieto Distillery, Widow Jane | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Road to Craigellachie – Hans Offringa

I think this is one of the quintessential books on whisky if you’re a Dutch whisky geek. Almost everyone has it or has at least read it, but I hadn’t until now. For some reason I never got around to it, even thought I’ve read the follow up ‘Still Stories’.

De Weg naar Craigellachie

De Weg naar Craigellachie

What this book entails is the way Hans Offringa got immersed in the world of whisky, and how his love for Scotland started and grew.

As anyone who took the effort to read my previous bunch of book reviews knows by now, I’m kind of a sucker for stories at the moment and I’m not reading too much on official whisky history, processes and books filled with just data. This one fits nicely into the category.

It starts briefly with Hans tasting his first whisky, and then quickly moves on to how he went to Scotland for the first time on business. Back then it had nothing to do with whisky, but that wouldn’t be that way for long.

As anyone who has read one of Hans’ books knows, his style of writing is one of the most captivating around. He has a certain ease with which he forms his sentences that make his books very easy to read and it more or less turns everything into a page turner. It’s the case in this book too.

The Road to Craigellachie

The Road to Craigellachie

What he has done very cleverly is combine the history of him, whisky and Scotland until 2003, and the 2003 trip to Craigellachie where he writes large parts this book. His ‘current’ surroundings remind him of  story, and then the story kicks in. It took me a chapter or two to get used to it, but it’s very well done and very captivating.

To make a long story short. It’s a very good, and very recommendable book. It nicely combines the world whisky, the tourism around it and a large chunk of Scottish culture and ties that nicely into a well combined bunch of short stories.

Also, what is surprising is that Hans’ laid back demeanor shines through these stories well. I’ve met the man a couple of times and I think he’s one of the most relaxed persons in the industry. He knows his stuff, he likes to tell stories but all in a very calm way.

Fun fact: By now I think Hans has signed so many copied of ‘The Road…’ (Or, in Dutch, ‘De weg naar Craigellachie’) that I must have one of the rare few unsigned copies!

I believe the book sold out recently and is awaiting reprint, but you can still find it at different shops and whisky retailers.

It’s available in Dutch here, at www.whiskyboeken.nl for € 10.
The English ‘revisited’ version is available from his own site for £ 10

(ISBN NL: 9789027497192, ISBN EN: 9789078668107)

Posted in - Book | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Edradour 2006-2013, 7yo, 59.2% – OB for The Whisky Exchange

The fourth Whisky Exchange sample in a row, and if memory serves, the last one in my stash at the moment. I’ll check later today, if I get around to it.

The fourth sample, and for the fourth time in a row, it’s a sample from a distillery that I am not overly familiar with. In this case that is because the whiskies I have tasted from them were far from commendable. This might be me picking bad examples, or just because the distillery’s product doesn’t really comply with my palate.

Most of their product is very young since they’re still coming back from a period of high inconsistency. They were not very common with independent bottlers until a few years ago when Van Wees, under their The Ultimate label released the first indie Edradour in a long time. Unfortunately, while a newsworthy feat, the whisky itself wasn’t very good.

Anyway, this one is picked by The Whisky Exchange. That in itself should take away some worries, but the ultimate test is in trying the whisky. Let’s do so.

Edradour 8yo for TWE

Edradour 8yo for TWE

Sniff:
Massive Oloroso on the nose, with some very zesty freshness coming in after that. I’d say lime. The Oloroso is rather fruity with a focus on citrus fruit too, but there’s shortbread from the spirit too. So far, I find it all rather simple. Not bad, but it’s not showing much depth. It shows some slightly sour notes that I associate with sherry’s flor more than anything else (see below). Dates, candied orange and maybe some apricot.

Sip:
The palate is dry and sharp with quite a noticeable alcohol burn. It’s not very pushy so the alcohol calms down rather quickly to show some oak, fruit and dry grainy notes. It’s fairly syrupy, and has some soot flavors as well. The fruit is not as outspoken as it was on the nose, and I have a hard time pinpointing any of the previously found types. There is a LOT of sherry though. And barley, that’s easy to find too.

Swallow:
The finish continues down the ‘very sherried’ track of choice. It’s thick and syrupy, with soot, some fruit, oak and maybe walnut shells. Rather dry in a slightly nutty way.

This is a bit of a strange whisky. In a way it just might be the most tasty Edradour I’ve ever had so far. On the other hand, on itself, it’s not a dram I’m overly fond of. I find the flavors to be rather inconsistent and on two different ends of the spectrum. Also, in a similarly confusing way, I find this whisky way too sherried. This is also a bit weird since it might be so that it covers up what otherwise would have been a very mediocre spirit from a distillery which doesn’t sit well with me.

All these considerations make me not a huge fan of this whisky. It sure has its qualities and if you’re a lover of high proof sherry flavours (and not too much else), this might just be for you.

A slight footnote: I might have found this whisky more enjoyable when tasted blind. It might be the case that this was reviewed in a more critical way since I already don’t lose any love for Edradour. This might be slightly worrisome.

On the flor remark: The flor hints are a bit strange, and might not be that at all. Edradour has a bit of a cheesy character after all. Jon Beach, of Fiddler’s Inn in Drumnadrochit lovingly called it Cheddradour. The flor is strange because Oloroso is a type of sherry that doesn’t have much flor. The yeast activity is limited by fortifying the wine early in the maturation process.

Edradour 2006-2013, 7yo, 59.2%, Oloroso Cask #240, OB for The Whisky Exchange.
Surprisingly, this is still available from The Whisky Exchange for £ 60 (€ 75)

Thanks for the sample, Billy and TWE!

Posted in Edradour | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kilchoman 2008-2013, 4yo, 61% – OB for The Whisky Show 2013

The third sample in a row from The Whisky Exchange. This time a Kilchoman from a bourbon cask, specially released for their The Whisky Show.

I’m not going to talk too much about Kilchoman since everybody has already done that and since they only opened a couple years ago, there’s not much to tell anyway. Their whisky’s surprisingly good for it’s age.

The main reason I’ve never really hooked on to the distillery is the price of each bottle. I’ve bought a couple when they initially started releasing their first bottlings. I already sold most of what I bought since the prices became rather ridiculous and the whisky wasn’t that good.

They’re currently releasing quite a few bottlings over the year with a fairly big number of private casks too. They usually clock in just below € 100. This is exactly where my personal issue with the distillery starts.

I like their whisky. It’s lovely. I also find it very, very expensive. On the other hand, I love what they’re doing and that they built the place from scratch. But still, a hundred bucks for a 4 or 5 year old whisky? I have trouble shelling out like that. On the other hand, this plays right in the cards of the eternal NAS discussion, since we can easily state that these 100 euro 5 year old whiskies are as tasty, if not better, than many more expensive whiskies.

Kilchoman for TWE. Great stuff

Kilchoman for TWE. Great stuff

Sniff:
The peat is very present, but very clean and gentle. Heather, light vanilla, meadow flowers. There’s also some mint there. Quite spicy, but I’m having a hard time pinpointing the scent. Peaty lime if that is a thing.

Sip:
Ridiculously sharp at first, but while the heat lingers, the other flavours become more gentle. Syrupy vanilla, white pepper, alcohol. Also heather and peat, so Islay in a glass, more or less. Sweeter lime and some candy sweetness.

Swallow:
The peat is very Ardbeg-like here. Clean, strong and slightly ashy. Again, the Islay flavours of heather. Oak, vanilla, rather floral.

Maybe I should start paying more attention to Kilchoman again. Maybe I should shell out for these bottlings, since they are rather epic. I think, although it would still sting to spend a hundred bucks on stuff that’s just barely legally whisky, this stuff is pretty awesome.

It’s not overly complex, but the flavours that are present are quite pronounced, and there is something to discover. As in, not overly complex, but neither is this a simple dram. I like that this is how I always expect good Ardbeg to taste (at younger ages) but Ardbeg is somehow off my drinking radar too (‘investment’ radar is different).

So in short, this is awesome whisky. I stand corrected in my Kilchoman statement.

Kilchoman 2008-2013, 4yo, 61%, bourbon cask, OB for The Whisky Show 2013. Surprisingly it’s still available at TWE for £ 75

Again, thanks to Billy and The Whisky Exchange for the sample!

Posted in Kilchoman | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Ledaig 16yo, 1997-2013, 56.8% – Gordon and Macphail for The Whisky Exchange

Ledaig and Tobermory, a distillery that supposedly releases some kick-ass drams every now and then, but one that I’ve never fallen in love with. I’ve tried quite a lot of the young Ledaigs from a couple years ago and can’t say I really enjoyed any of them. Some were more acceptable than others, but none were truly stunning.

Anyway, another sample sent to me by Billy Abbott, of blogging, twitter and The Whisky Exchange fame. I love trying stuff that’s out of my comfort zone and sometimes you encounter really cool and tasty stuff. Like yesterday’s Glentauchers.

Ledaig currently is popular again. A few years ago every bottler and their brother was bottling 5 year old single casks. Currently they’re highly popular with festivals and other, more private, bottlers. At 8 years old so you’d expect the production being ridiculously high in 2006.

I wonder if there’s going to be any casks left over for longer aging so there can be any comparisons. This one, however, is quite a lot older than those many bottlings, since it’s from 1997 and bottled at 16 years old. I’m not sure if I’ve ever had one this old. I’m pretty sure I haven’t tried any of their famous 1973 bottlings. Let’s dive in!

Ledaig 1997 by TWE

Ledaig 1997 by TWE

Sniff:
Much lighter in the smoke department than I expected. The smoke surely has picked up on the sherry and, like yesterday’s Glentauchers, is rather barbecue-y. Rather gentle with wood char, sweet barbecue marinade, brown sugar, ash. Maybe some grilled paprika / bell pepper / capsicum.

Sip:
Here the alcohol kicks in, with ashy smoke, lots of charred oak and charcoal. Quite some alcohol burn, with toffee sweetness and barbecue. Some thick syrupy caramel sauce. Pretty tasty.

Swallow:
The finish is gentle quick, but does leave some burn in your throat. Pretty long with some dates and toffee, on top of the rather coarse smokiness.

It’s a strange one, this one. With 16 years, a lot of alcohol and an active sherry cask, you’d expect a true bomb. And, in a way, it is exactly that. It’s just that in a different way. There’s not a HUGE amount of sherry going on, not too much fruit and spices, but quite some smoke and wood. Again, like yesterday, not a whisky that’s been overpowered.

I’m quite enamored with this dram. It’s fierce, and I don’t think you’ll find a lot of depth if you try it again and again, but it is incredibly drinkable. You’re in for an experience and a rather tasty one if I may say so.

It’s sold out, and bottlings like this are not very fashionable in auctions so I think you’ll be having a hard time finding one if you want to. I know I’m keeping my eyes peeled for this, and the Glentauchers. If the price is right of course.

Ledaig 16yo, 1997-2013, 56.8%, Gordon and Macphail for The Whisky Exchange. It’s about € 66, according to Whiskybase.

Thanks for the sample, Billy and TWE!

Posted in Ledaig, Tobermory | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Glentauchers 16yo, 1997-2013, 54.3% – Gordon and Macphail for The Whisky Exchange

The  long titles to blog posts seem to be becoming a theme. Maybe I should just review some drams that were regular OBs instead of private casks by independent bottlers.

Anyway, Glentauchers is a distillery that’s mostly used in Ballantines and is not available regularly. Not from themselves, and occasionally from indies. I could start rambling on with all kinds of uninteresting facts, but to be honest, I don’t have much to say about it except that I drove past it during our 2012 family holiday.

I’m slightly ashamed by it since we were just driving around looking for another distillery, I think it was Strathisla. In the end we never got there because Ot, my then seven month old daughter got tired of being stuck in the car for daddy’s hobby.

Credit where credit is due: I got these samples a long time ago from Billy Abbott. I wanted to taste them earlier, but there was no commercial pressure since they were already sold out. Then they got swallowed up by the massive amount of stuff in the ‘to taste and review’ stack.

Glentauchers for TWE, by Gordon & Macphail

Glentauchers for TWE, by Gordon & Macphail

Sniff:
Big sherry and big alcohol. Quite a dry and nutty scent to it, with some sherry spices. Some dates and raisin twigs. Slightly bitter and sweet. Quite a hearty scent, but I really like it so far. Nutmeg and burnt caramel.

Sip:
The palate is rather fierce, drying and very sharp with alcohol burn. There’s a lot of sweetness and that slightly bitter note behind it. There’s a lot of bittersweet sherry, caramel and brazil nuts, hazelnuts.

Swallow:
The finish goes mostly toward the nuts, dates and sherry, and is very warming. Surprisingly, it’s not a very long finish, but it is tasty. Slightly barbecue-y with lots of charcoal and sweetness.

I have to admit that I wasn’t expecting much. That might be a tad cynical because the guys at The Whisky Exchange are not known for picking mediocre casks. This one is one of those casks that restores a bit of faith in a distillery usually blended away and not ‘shown’ to the public.

This is a surprisingly good dram, if you’re into big sherry. It’s not very big on things other than the sherry, while it’s not just sherry on steroids. The bitterness is something I’m into at the moment so this one comes at exactly the right time. Good stuff!

Also, at not even € 70, I wish I had picked this up. Bummer. I should pay more attention. But then again, there’s a dozen shops and bottlers I should pay more attention to and we can’t have them all, can we?

Glentauchers 16yo, 1997-2013, 54.3%, Gordon and Macphail for The Whisky Exchange, sold out.

Thanks to Billy and The Whisky Exchange for sending a sample!

Posted in Glentauchers | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment