Auchentoshan 15, 48.4% – Douglas Laing’s Old Particular

Little over a week ago there was another Twitter Tasting held by Steve from The Whisky Wire. He’s rather active at organizing those, but since I’m able to participate every now and then, you won’t hear me complaining!

This time Douglas Laing’s Old Particular range was up, which is to be released as we speak and comes from the new Douglas Laing. The company split up a while ago when the two brothers at the helm each went their separate ways. According to news blogger The Whisky Sponge, they’ll keep splitting up into smaller companies until they have world domination.

Anyway, the first whisky we tasted (blind) was this Auchentoshan.

Old Particular

Old Particular

Sniff:
Sweet with a touch of savouriness (is that Umami?). Some vanilla, old grass, unroasted cocoa beans. Slightly nutty with walnuts, some sweet citrus and even a touch of salt.

Sip:
It’s not too sharp (we didn’t know the strength either), with some tame vanilla again, grass, citrus, granny smith apples, sugar syrup, white tea, lemon oil and pear.

Swallow:
Gentle, but the freshness is gone. Some pear and spices, grass and straw and hay.

After tasting it I would have guessed this was a Bladnoch, because of the slight weirdness of the whisky. It was a Lowlander, but just a different one and one of the least sweet Auchentoshans I have ever tasted. It’s a nice whisky, but not a stellar one. One you will enjoy drinking but not hunt down a second bottle of. I don’t know what the RRP is so no info on that.

Auchentoshan 15, 48.4%, Refill Hogshead, Douglas Laing’s Old Particular

Posted in Auchentoshan | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dalmore Cask Sample, 17 years old, 55.74%

During Maltstock Jon Beach was pulling all kinds of rarities from his bag. This varied from a 1978 Signatory Vintage Port Ellen, to a blend of the first 9 releases popped in a bottle from That Boutique-y Whisky Company. The other things were also surprises. These were a 1975 Balblair in a ‘The Monaco Blend’ bottle, and a full bottle of Dalmore that, apparently, is a cask sample of a really sherried dram.

I guess he didn’t want to take everything home again since I think I saw the Monaco Blend on the table on Sunday morning, and the Dalmore (of which I asked for a sample) was given to me, as a sample.

Since you don’t come across many Dalmores, from the distillery, at cask strength, he didn’t have to ask twice! I love trying this kind of off-the-beaten path stuff!

Dalmore Cask Sample

Dalmore Cask Sample

Sniff:
There is a lot more sherry in here than the colour made me expect. Apart from the high abv I wouldn’t have been surprised if this was sherry and whisky mixed, instead of just cask maturation. It is lovely though! Lots of raisins but also custard sweetness, vanilla. Quite some oak and the ABV is very present on the nose.

Sip:
It’s fresh and crisp, but very sweet and very light even. Pepper and other spices, dates, raisins and a soft, gentle oakiness.

Swallow:
Very sweet still, and lingering. The raisins are the main theme of this dram. The custard and vanilla are back too. Now I also get apple crumble and honey.

Now this is a Dalmore I would gladly spend some money on! If the distillery would do releases like this, at a decent price (which in this case would be, I guess, € 90 or so), I’d be a very happy camper and have a lot more respect. Unfortunately, single cask stuff apparently has to go into some collection and fetch at least € 2500 per bottle so chances are slim.

I was very surprised by the sweetness of it all and the amount of sherry in this dram. I generally don’t veer towards whisky that is this heavilly sherried but in this case I kind of loved it. It’s not too complex but just very, very delicious!

Dalmore Cask Sample, 17 years old, 55.74%

Thanks to Jon Beach for the leftover!

Posted in Dalmore | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arran, The Westie, 1998-2011, 46%

When Arran started to release their Icons of Arran series in 2009 not many people took notice. They came, they went and that was that.

Now, a couple of years later they’ve turned out to be highly collectible and their very fair price has risen quite a bit. Especially the first one, The Peacock, is worth about € 250, according to Whiskybase. That bottle started out at about € 40 to € 50, if I recall correctly.

I’ve tasted that one, and it’s a great whisky. But is it worth the same as that 10 year old Port Ellen I tasted a few days ago? Apparently, but it sure makes me wish I had a case to sell!

The Westie is the third of the four releases (the others being The Peacock, The Rowan Tree and The Golden Eagle) and depicts Arran’s distillery dog Ruaraidh. I’m glad they went for The Westie instead of its name.

It’s a blend of 22 selected refill Oloroso hogsheads, so a bit of sweetness is expected.

Arran The Westie. Image from Whiskybase

Arran The Westie. Image from Whiskybase

Sniff (no pun intended):
Even after 12 or 13 years in casks it still smells pretty young to me with hints of spirit and genever. I get barley too but all in a bit of a boring way. Some oak and the iconic Arran apple scent is present too, but in an old and corky way. A touch of white pepper for some spice.

Sip:
Spicy, the pepper picks up. Otherwise rather one dimensional with grass and oak. Not much else is happening. The touch of apple, a bit of sweetness.

Swallow:
A continuation of the palate with some more influences of barley and cookie dough.

When this one came out I was very much in doubt whether or not I should pick a few up for its collectibility but I’m glad I didn’t. While The Peacock has a certain appeal, as does The Rowan Tree, this one lacks that. Since this one still hasn’t sold out, I’m guessing I’m not the only one.

Anyway, the casks are refill ones and I don’t think it’s a second fill. The flavours of the cask are very limited.

Arran, Icons of Arran 3: The Westie, 1998-2011, 46%. Available at Whiskybase for € 64.95

Posted in Arran | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pittyvaich 20, 1989-2009, 57.5%

This whisky might be the last ever Pittyvaich to be bottled. There never was much to go around and they didn’t close it because they liked the whisky all that much, I guess. Most of it went to blenders (which is why the distillery was built in the first place) and since it closed in 1993 after only 19 years of being in production almost everything is probably blended away.

I recently tasted this whisky again after it had been sitting on my shelf for almost four years at Maltstock, during Michael Lord’s masterclass of Dufftown. I decided not to take notes since I wanted to do that from my own bottle in a bit more quiet environment.

There’s not much else to say, so let’s get right to it!

Pittyvaich 20

Pittyvaich 20

Sniff:
Although it’s 20 years old, it still smells pretty young to me. There’s a lot of barley and spirit influence going on, very malty and even some wheat flavours. Old, corky apples and shaved oak planks. It’s a bit strange but actually a very interesting dram.

Sip:
Although it’s bottled at 57.5% ABV it feels more gentle than that, luckily. It’s pretty creamy and dry at the same time. Grains, straw, oak. Some vanilla and sawdust but in a syrupy way. Like golden syrup.

Swallow:
Although… It became a gimmick to start with that but there is no way I can build a logical sentence at this point. Some vanilla, but in a spicy way. A pretty long finish with sawdust, old oak shelves and a touch of furniture polish.

A dram that is more interesting that delicious. It’s nice, don’t get me wrong, but I don’t think I would buy it again if I got the chance. Not even at the original price (about € 100 I think). It’s nice, but not more than that. The flavours are all fairly generic and for that money you would expect a bit more than nice, genericness.

It’s still available though. For example, Master of Malt has it at £ 138.21. I would have expected more after four years and being quite rare.

Pittyvaich 20, 1989-2009, 57.5%

Posted in Pittyvaich | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Millstone 1999, PX Cask, 14yo, 46%

The very new Millstone PX Cask has just been announced last week by Patrick van Zuidam on Facebook. I was ballsy enough to ask for a sample and he was nice enough to send me some booze!

I thought I owed it to him to taste it really quickly so here’s the review already!

There isn’t much Dutch whisky worth trying and most distilling operations do whisky as a fun side traject. Us Heit makes Frysk Hynder which is very much avoidable. De Molen does some distilling but they’re not there yet. Vallei tried their hand for a while but have long since stopped again. There are some other fledgling operations of which I have never tried anything yet. I think I have a spirit of Eylandt Spirit on my shelf from a distillery in Zeeland, but I’d have to check.

When Zuidam started with Millstone I almost bought a bottle, but the shop I was at recommended me to taste it first. I didn’t end up buying anything. Then I more or less lost interest until Zuidam released their Dutch Rye which is very nice, and later the 100 Rye which is a stunning dram.

I have tried some of their newer single malts, but nothing over 8 years old. Their 12 year old is supposed to be good since it won last year’s Whisky Advocate World Whisky award.

Anyway, now this. PX casks are a bit tricky but can generate some terrific whisky. In combination with Millstone, I’m not sure yet, but let’s see!

Millstone 1999 PX Cask

Millstone 1999 PX Cask

Sniff:
Very intense! I guess I have to set aside everything I know from Scottish Single Malt, since this is produced in a different kind of still and that is very noticable. The sherry isn’t very clear at first. It’s getting more fruity after a minute or two of air, with peach, then honey and nuts. It’s quite genever like and has a massive hit of sellery all of a sudden.

Sip:
The palate shifts a bit towards more obvious flavours and is sweet with quite a bit of kick. Raisins, the sellery is still present but less so. Pepper, sherry and spiced cake. Quite crisp too (which is kind of strange because it’s sherried). A mountain of liquorice, and Wiebertjes and Potter’s.

Potters Original. A very Dutch cough sweet

Potters Original. A very Dutch cough sweet

Swallow:
The finish is again peppery but veers towards the typical sherry notes a bit more. Again, liquorice, and lots of it. The laurel infused kind this time. Sweet, fruity with starfruit, marachino cherries. Not overly long.

I really had to set aside my expectations of any single malt. It’s very different from the style coming from pot stills as they are used in Scotland. When I did that, however, I found a really tasty spirit that challenges everything you know about booze. There’s a lot of different things going on with flavours all over the spectrum.

The sellery is something I’ve never encountered before in any booze, but I kind of like that flavour anyway, so I was good. The combination with spiced cake was a bit strange, but not in a bad way.

So, in short: This is a delightful whisky that really challenges you. Not a real session-drinker if you know what I mean.

Millstone 1999, PX Cask, 14yo, 46%, I don’t know a price yet.

Thanks to Patrick and the team at Zuidam for a sample!

Posted in - World Whisky, Zuidam | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Port Ellen 10, 43%, 1983-1993 – Signatory’s Scottish Wildlife

When I was given this wee sample I was baffled. A friend came up to me at Maltstock and told me to try it. A 10 year old Port Ellen! That’s at least a 20 year old bottle, and then of a distillery that has people paying hundreds of euros for a bottle… I didn’t really know what to say.

I did know what to do, however: Taste it! I was a bit apprehensive at first since, while Port Ellen is one of the most expensive distilleries to buy whisky of, they are not necessarily all great. I don’t think I’ve ever tasted a bad Port Ellen, but I did taste some very uninteresting ones.

I don’t know much about the Scottish Wildlife series, but I know Signatory has vast stocks of everything at the moment, so maybe this is a cracker. I know there’s an otter on the label, which is nice.

Image from Whiskybase

Image from Whiskybase

Sniff:
At Maltstock 2012 Jon Beach had everyone sniff lemon candy and chamois/shammy/wash leather, since that makes up Port Ellen, according to him. I guess he has to love this one then, since those two flavours are huge. The lemon candy are those Napoleon balls, with powder inside them. The peat is pretty light, especially for a 10 year old. Apart from those flavours I get shoe polish too.

Sip:
It’s a bit sweeter than I expected with lots of simply syrup. It has a bit more bite, on the other hand. Again, lots of lemon but with the sweetness I veer towards lemon curd. It takes a bit longer for the wash leather and shoe polish to pop up, but they’re definetly here!

Swallow:
The finish is gentle but intense. A lot more peat flavours at this point, but apart from that I get the wash leather and lemon candy again. Shoe polish, white oak, grain dust.

My wee Port Ellen sample.

My wee Port Ellen sample.

While this is not the most complex Port Ellen I’ve ever tried, it certainly is a delicious whisky. The wash leather and lemon candy make this a very iconic one in my book. A showcase for the distillery.

Port Ellen 10, 43%, 1983-1993, Signatory’s Scottish Wildlife. Worth about € 265 now.

Thanks for the sample, Martin! I loved it!

Posted in Port Ellen | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Maltstock – Bourbon & Innovation with Hans Offringa

This Masterclass was not exactly scheduled to appear in the regular line-up but was announced pretty late as a prize for the winners of the whisky quiz. In the end, it turned out, it was also for the runner-ups. The 1st prize was the masterclass and a bottle of whisky (for each team member).

Anyway, this masterclass took place half an hour after the Michael Lord’s one ended so more or less during lunch. I ran out quickly after downing another dram of that terrific Convalmore for a sandwich and right back in for this wee event.

Hans Offringa. Photo by Ernst J. Scheiner.

Hans Offringa. Photo by Ernst J. Scheiner.

I didn’t know what to expect but I noticed right away that there was A LOT of booze on the table, in front of all seats. 10 samples in a single masterclass! All unlabeled.

The first row of three had a bit a quiz in it: It contained 2 bourbons and one six month old bourbon that was artificially ‘aged’ by Terressentia. Luckily, I was able to pick it out without much effort. The bourbons were much more rounded while the Terressentia one had a bit of a plasticy nose and taste, with the smoothness of regular bourbon. The biggest give-away was the lack of wood influence.

The others turned out to be 1 year old Maker’s Mark and Jim Beam Black.

The second row was a mini masterclass of Woodinville‘s products. This fledgling distillery in Washington has been in business for little over two years so we tasted their new make, the 1 year old and the 2 year old. The new make tasted pretty okay with a lot of corn sweetness (no surprise there) while the 1 year old was a lot more mature of course. It was already a nice product on its own. The 2 year old was comparable to the one year old. A bit more wood influence, but there was quite some freshness too.

Row three had three samples of Maker’s Mark lined up. In combination with the one year old from the beginning this was a very interesting row. The new make tasted fairly regular. I don’t have enough experience with new make to pick up the subtleties, but the one year old was already gentle, very sweet and not much wood. The regular one was exactly that, the regular one. The last in the row was an over-age. Probably about 8 or 9 years old, while the normal bottling consists of whisky of around 6 years old (5.75 to 6.5, according to Sietse Offringa/Offspringa).

The tenth and last sample was proper hooch. How Hans got it and how it ended up in The Netherlands is the stuff of legend and much speculation. As we tasted it (it’s not too bad actually) Hans told it the stuff is mostly used for infusions and other non-drinking stuff. At least by him…

The strangest thing about this masterclass was that it turned out to be a highlight of Maltstock. I enjoyed the other masterclasses but this one brougt something really new to the table. It went in depth with the artificially aged version of a bourbon. It had stuff from a new distillery and a line-up of booze from Maker’s Mark that is not something I have ever been able to try before. Incredibly cool and thanks to Hans!

I will go more in depth on the Terressentia thing after trying my sample.

Posted in - American Whiskey, Maker's Mark, Woodinville | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Maltstock – Cadenhead Masterclass with Mark Watt

The third Masterclass I went for was my number one choice of the bunch. Cadenhead

The independent bottler has been off the radar in The Netherlands for the biggest part of the past decade since their shop in Amsterdam went bust, twice. I know that they were very restrictive in otherwise having their whisky imported until two or three years ago so for quite a while all you could get from them was older bottlings.

The drawback of these older bottlings was, to be frank, they were boring. Mind, I’m talking 1995-2003 or so, not the black dumpies from decades ago. Most of the bottlings were young, high in abv and from rather tired casks. A friend bought a couple Islays and they were all more or less similar. 

Now, with Mark Watt steering the ship they have revamped their entire range with new bottles, a much larger variety in casks and age range. Everybody was hoping for a showcase of these drams during the Masterclass.

Mark Watt is casting a spell. Photo by Steven d'Hondt

Mark Watt is casting a spell. Photo by Steven d’Hondt

Mark Watt, however, had other plans. He decided to deconstruct a (to be?) released blend from Cadenheads that consists of some rather old whisky. The oldest is from 1989, the youngest from 1993. 

Cameronbridge 1989
Creamy and sweet on the nose, with wheat and quite some alcohol punch. The palate was pretty dry and sharp with grain and vanilla. A bit thin though. The finish had coconut, vanilla and wheat. Classic grain whisky, but nothing special.

Bruichladdich 1993
A massive hit of barley at first, then salt and sweet, porridge. I also wrote ‘terrible’. I meant that. The palate had barley again, syrupy sweetness, salt and liquorice. The finish was sharp and grainy, and boring. This one tastes like random old Bruichladdich which has a tendency of being rather bad.

Invergordon 1991 (sherry butt)
Sweet, vanilla, pastry cream, coconut and a certain lightness that picks it up. The palate has quite some oak, apricot and other fruits. The finish is light, crisp, with coconut, lots of fruit and lasts quite a bit.

Mortlach 1992 (sherry butt)
Sherry and nuts, fruit, rich leather and furniture polish. Rather traditional Mortlach. The palate was a bit iron-like, with raisins, fruit, sherry and pretty sharp. The finish was again sharp, fruity with some spices and some sherry notes.

Mark Watt being abducted by Vikings

Mark Watt being abducted by Vikings

The strange thing of this all is that I remember Mark not being thrilled about the Bruichladdich too, but using it for a bit of volume. A very strange remark from someone at the head of the company that just released the blend that these whiskies went in to.

Everyone was yapping continuously, especially after the initial surprise of not being able to taste the new Cadenhead whiskies. It didn’t improve after tasting the Bruichladdich either. In the middle of the Masterclass the guys from Highland Park (Sietse and Martin) ran in and kidnapped him for a couple of minutes. No explanation given so this all was a bit of ‘winging it’, as it felt.

Therefore, this masterclass was not as interesting as most attendants hoped. It still was nice and especially the Invergordon grain whisky was damn tasty, but still, most people were a bit baffled at why someone would do a masterclass like this. Especially when it was so easy to do something much more impressive.

Mark Watt did his best to entertain us, let that be said. He’s a great guy and I loved hanging out with him later that night. A strange discussion about how many monkeys fit in a microwave ensued. Later migrating to how you’d be able to fold Martine Nouet into a pie with the monkeys. I guess we all had a dram too many at that point.

The blend itself, before I forget! We, of course, also tasted that one. 
The Bruichladdich influence is clear and a pity. The other whiskies have a very hard time coming through and are really held in check by the old barley scents of the Bruichladdich. Leather, heavy and not really nice to nose. The palate had cardboard, old sweaty leather and golden syrup. The finish was heavy too, with fruit, sherry, oak, polish and chocolate syrup.

Posted in - Blended Whisky, - Grain Whisky, Bruichladdich, Cameronbridge, Invergordon, Mortlach | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Maltstock – A trip around Dufftown with Michael Lord

The second masterclass I got for this year’s Maltstock was titles ‘The Whiskyshop Dufftown’. Apart from that, no information was given and with Michael Lord it can go any way I figured.

Last year he was at the festival with some of his own bottlings, but I’m not sure he did a masterclass or not. At least, I wasn’t there. So, hoping for some truly interesting drams we all sat around anxiously when he announced his round of Dufftown.

Michael Lord (during the Whisky Quiz). Photo by Rolf Kruger

Michael Lord (during the Whisky Quiz). Photo by Rolf Kruger

A slight murmur of disappointment ensued since, while Dufftown has a lot of distilleries, it is highly unlikely to taste the most interesting ones: Kininvie, Convalmore and (do I dare say it?) Parkmore. The more well known ones are Balvenie, Glenfiddich, Mortlach, Dufftown and Glendullan.

The Glendullan was first, an 12 year old from Provenance. Light and fruity, with oatmeal and pear. On the palate it was rather thin and sweet with pear and peach. The finish was rather fresh but turned more towards artificial flavours (pear drops).

Next was a 14 year old Mortlach from a bourbon cask, bottled by The Maltman. A rather nice nose with barley, cream and banana. The palate had a light pepperiness, oak, banana and vanilla cream. On the finish it turned a bit more earthy.

Third was a 20 year old Pittyvaich from Diageo’s special releases of 2010. I have a bottle of this so a more in depth review will follow shortly.

Fourth came one of the closed distilleries, Convalmore. One of Mark Watt’s new Cadenhead dumpy-like bottlings. Distilled in 1977. This turned out to be a damn tasty dram with sherry, plums, honey, orange and raisins on the nose. There was a hint of flint as well, but in a very good way. The palate had sweet oak, nuts and dried fruits. On the finish it turned even greater with honey and slightly bitter fruit.

Next came a Singleton of Dufftown 18. As many of the Singleton releases, I find them very uninteresting. Cereal, vanila, thin and flat. Some fudge.

Michael Lord making faces. No one knows why. Image by Dick de Jong

Michael Lord making faces. No one knows why. Image by Dick de Jong

Before last was a Glenfiddich. Luckily, not just any Glenfiddich, but the Distillery Only of them. A 15 year old Cask Strength release of their Solera bottling. Lots of fruits and sherry on the nose, oak and honey. On the palate more honey, soft tropical fruits and a hint of pepper. Fruity sherry and oak on a long finish. Pretty damn tasty, if you ask me!

The last dram was Balvenie’s 17 year old peated cask. I had never tried this one, contrary to about everyone on the planet that cares about whisky, apparently. I expected this to be an Islay cask, but apparently there has been some heavily peated Balvenie that got misplaced in their massive warehouses. Legend has it that no one knows where these casks are, but the ones that the whisky was in before were used for this whisky.

On the nose it had the honey and toffee of Balvenie, but the very slight peatiness turned it all up a notch and made everything a tad more intense. The palate had honey and orange, again with a tangy peatiness. The finish had a bit more peat than the rest and lasted long, with mostly honey flavours.

So, no Parkmore (that would have set him back quite a bit) or Kininvie. What made this tasting great was the presentation that Michael Lord did. He is quite the comedian and knows how to take the piss on every distillery around Dufftown but also how to make up for that. Great jokes, and some pretty nice whiskies too, especially numbers 4, 6 and 7.

The murmur of disappointment at first proved to be unnecessary. We should have known Mike would take proper care of us. Glad he did!

Posted in - Festival, Balvenie, Convalmore, Dufftown, Glendullan, Glenfiddich, Mortlach, Pittyvaich | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Islay’s ninth distillery! Good news indeed!

I’m not going to regurgitate stuff that’s been around the internet all day, but here are two of the more complete reports:

http://www.whiskyadvocateblog.com/2013/09/14/islay-to-get-ninth-distillery/

http://islayvisits.net/2013/09/15/a-9th-distillery-on-islay/

Posted in Gartbreck | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment