The Usquebaugh Society’s 24th birthday – part 2

The rest of the birthday party for the Usquebaugh Society continued in much the same way. Epic whiskies were tasted, dumb jokes were being made (something about booze, and 30 good guys in one room), and tasting notes were scribbled down.

Limerick 1988 by Adelphi (Image from Royal Mile Whiskies)

Limerick 1988 by Adelphi (Image from Royal Mile Whiskies)

The fourth whisky of the afternoon was the Limerick 1988, bottled by Adelphi. Back when this came out it was received with some doubt. A premium priced Irish whiskey from an undisclosed distillery. I seem to remember it not selling too quickly initially. Nowadays, those things are much more viable since whisky fanatics like me and loads of others have found those whiskies are ridiculously good. Fruit bombs that even Lochside 1981 has a hard time keeping up with.

The nose of the Limerick is fruity like that with pineapple and a boat load of maracuja / passion fruit. It has a slight scent of ethanol and barley too. Slightly green at that, which I would sooner associate with Single Pot Still that Single Malt. The palate is slightly drying and sharper than I expected for a 58% whisky at 24 years old. The fruit and green barley are back too, and the passion fruit too. Lots of it. Pineapple too and something that is slightly bitter in a fruity way. The finish is exactly like the nose makes you expect. Not too long though. Fecking great!

I love this stuff. It’s ridiculously fruity without being overly sweet or too lemonade-like. This is a great whisky for sure. I would expect the extreme fruitiness to come from Bushmills.

Next up was Port Ellen. A bottling for The Whisky Shop buttled by Douglas Laing at 57.9%. Everybody always expects great things from Port Ellen, but I mostly am slightly wary. A lot of them are not as good as their price tag suggests. One of my fellow club members said this was one of the few Port Ellens he liked because it was more subtle than usual. I generally prefer the ones that really taste like lemon candy and shammy leather, so this was going to be interesting.

Tomatin 24 by Getränke Weiser. (Image from Whiskybase)

Tomatin 24 by Getränke Weiser. (Image from Whiskybase)

On the nose it was subtle, as promised, with smoke and salt, shammy leather but not much. Also lemon and white pepper. The palate is spicy and dry, with smoke and lemon. It’s slightly sharp but the flavors are all toned down a little bit. Christmas pudding and some red fruit. A grain flavor that’s surprisingly heavy. More like oats than barley. The finish is very consistent, and rather long and rich.

I would never have guessed this was a sherry cask by the color of it. The flavors make you doubt that notion but the Christmas pudding gives it a way a little bit. It’s a great Port Ellen, but not my favorite. However, a bottle in my collection would be nice!

Then a Tomatin 24 year old bottled by Getränke Weiser in 2004, so an oldie if there was one. At 54.2% it’s one of the more mellow whiskies of the afternoon. It’s a fruity one again, but lighter and less ‘in your face’ than the Limerick 1988. Pineapple, some maracuja, pear but also barley porridge, chalk and some cinnamon. The palate is dry and fruity with French bread, grains and licorice, pineapple, mango and passion fruit. The finish is very short with fruit and bread.

Brora 1977 from the Rare Malts

Brora 1977 from the Rare Malts

An interesting choice to put this after the Port Ellen and not such a lucky one I think. Also, the fruitiness is less explosive than the Irish one, but still rather tasty. I do find the finish too short though.

Last but not least was the Rare Malts Brora 24yo from 1977. I have had this one before so I didn’t write the most extensive tasting notes. And, like I’ve had before at tasting events, I just wanted to enjoy the whisky without picking it apart too much.

The whisky itself is very comparable to the Clynelish, but everything is in overdrive. The farm scents and flavors are more powerful. It’s not as light, but very comparable. The peat is pretty prominent and almost overpowering in combination with the alcohol, so while this is a ridiculously tasty whisky, I prefer the Clynelish.

So that was that. Seven 24 year old whiskies in good company and of a quality level that is seldom seen at whisky tastings. My favorite was the Clynelish, followed by the Limerick and Brora. The Cambus clocked in last, the Tomatin did slightly better and the middle ground is held by the Highland Park and the Port Ellen.

I still can’t really comprehend that they’ve been able to host this tasting for € 45 per person. I am wondering what the 25 year old tasting next year will bring and I’m already looking forward to it!

Posted in - Irish Whiskey, Brora, Port Ellen, Tomatin, Undisclosed | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Usquebaugh Society’s 24th birthday – part 1

As has been usual for a couple years now, the Usquebaugh Society’s birthday is celebrated by a whisky tasting for members. Some of the more avid collectors of the club browse their collections and auction sites for impressive whiskies as old as the club. So this year the entire tasting consisted of 24 year old whiskies. Seven of them.

The initial guideline for the line up was that Malt Maniacs Monitor was used as a measuring stick. Four maniacs should have tasted the whisky and the average score had to be higher than 90 points. Of course, this is nigh impossible and that level has never been achieved. This year, two of the seven drams were on that short list of possibilities though!

The start of the tasting was slightly chaotic as it turned out the old beamer didn’t have the same plugs as the new laptop, so a run to the Apple store around the corner was necessary and with a 20 minute delay everything was in place and the first dram was passed around.

This was a 24 year old Cambus grain whisky bottled for the Bladnoch Forum about four years ago. It’s a lovely one that I reviewed earlier here. I still like it, but my old rating of five stars is too high obviously. I have both become more realistic and spoiled.

Dram number two was a 24 year old Clynelish from 1983, bottled by Old Malt Cask, so obviously it’s clocking in at 50% abv. The nose of this baby starts with pine resin, oak and a slight salty note. It’s a tad dry too and gentle with apple and pear. Slightly farmy and it has those light notes that old Bowmore can also have. The palate is gentle with the typical Clynelish waxy notes, wax candles, some lemon. Also pine trees and salt. The finish is not too long, but has those crisp notes again. Quite rich with lemon curd, those farmy notes, vanilla.

I love Clynelish. This one is especially great in my book. My favorite of the afternoon, even. And that’s in a tasting with Brora, Port Ellen, Tomatin and Highland Park. But the light farmy notes, the wax and resin. I love it all. Now, to get myself a bottle of this…

Bram van Glabbeek talking us through the booze

The third dram was a Highland Park 1981. A great year if there ever was one 😉 This one was bottled by Adelphi at 24 years old and 55.8% abv. The nose started fairly closed off with acetone and some distant hints of sherry. After a minute or two it started opening up with dates, plums and a beefy note. The palate is creamy with fruit, dry sherry and that beefy note again. Dates and plums again, pretty heavy and dry. The finish is not too rich and slightly less smoky than the palate (yes the palate was smoky, I should’ve mentioned) and fruity.

While it is a damn tasty whisky, I’m not an huge fan of this profile. Of course, there’s a lot of whisky that fits this and is awesome. This is one of them, but I’m more into the Brora and Clynelish stuff.

With this dram there was a snack of smoked chicken cream on toast. While this was damn tasty and a great combination on the palate, the food massively overpowered the nose which means my notes for the nose of the Highland Park are a bit short.

Between all this heavy hitting violence some folks at my table pulled out some stuff they brought themselves, mostly also 24 years old. Pretty awesome and I felt a bit like a freeloader with not bringing anything myself…

These drams were hugely different to anything that was in the official line-up. This Jura is pretty nice and tastes like good butter. Serge gave it 92 points which to my palate seems a bit high, but then again. It’s one of the nicest Juras I’ve ever had!

The Auchroisk was rather heavy, leathery and industrial. Not too complex but very tasty. Good stuff!

Tomorrow I’ll review the other whiskies from the official line-up and the bites that were had with that too.

Posted in - Grain Whisky, - Irish Whiskey, Cambus, Clynelish, Highland Park | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Master of Malt’s Dramcrackers

Last week I received a package from Master of Malt with their dramcrackers inside. Pretty cool, right?

I’m not sure what to do with it though. Generally, when shops or bottlers send me booze they want a review of it on my blog. This time though, the Dramcrackers pack seems to be focused on drinking some nice, but fairly random drams. With family, during Christmas, for example.

This gives me a bit of a dilemma. On one hand I want to oblige Master of Malt by reviewing the booze inside (some malt whisky, some gin, some brandy, a bourbon and a sloe gin). On the other hand I would love nothing more than to get with the general idea of the dramcrackers and just pop them open over the festive season with my brother in law and see what everything is about.

The drawback of that (if you can call it that) is that I refrain from writing notes. I try to be sort of conscious about what I’m tasting, but there will be no note-writing at the dinner table.

So, I want to give a shout out to Master of Malt for sending me this cool package. It really pops! (worst pun ever…). There’s even going to be some kind of competition in old fashioned wild west duel style, with movies on Youtube and such! Pretty awesome!

The contents of the pack are the following, and at some € 48 it seems to be fairly priced and would make a cool Christmas gift. Although you’d need some seriously massive feet if this would fit your stocking.

Bathtub Gin
Arran – Batch 3 (That Boutique-y Whisky Company)
Rumbullion!
Bathtub Gin – Sloe Gin 2014
Smooth Ambler Old Scout 7 Year Old Bourbon
Professor Cornelius Ampleforth’s Cherry Brandy 2014

Really looking forward to all of them!

The Dramcracker pack is available from Master of Malt at £ 37.95 / € 48

Full disclosure: Master of Malt sent me a pack of this, free of charge. Thanks a million, dudes!

Posted in - American Whiskey, - Other Distilleries, - Other Spirits, - Rum, Arran, Smooth Ambler | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Great King St. Glasgow Blend, 43% – Compass Box

The second sample of the ones that Compass Box recently sent me. This is the first permanent edition to their Great King St. series of blends. I never reviewed the first one on this blog but let’s keep it at ‘I friggin’ love that stuff!’.

As far as I know the Great King Street (GKS) is a Clynelish heavy blend with more malts than grains, but of course, that information is not on the label anywhere. The first one had quite a bit of the typical Clynelish waxiness without ever feeling heavy.

And as I said before in the review of The General and The Lost Blend, Compass Box are on a roll. They have been releasing cracking whiskies for a quite some years now and also their standard editions (to which this has been added) are pretty great too, with my favorite being the Peat Monster.

Sniff:
A light note of salt, and some thick syrupy vanilla. Quite some candle wax too, with soft oak and maybe a hint of fresh mint. It’s slightly sandy, and rather crisp. The vanilla is pretty strong in this one, without it smelling like custard.

Sip:
The palate is surprisingly dry, with some white and black pepper. Oak again too, but more classic than the soft version on the nose. The vanilla is present as well, but not as strong as on the nose. A light flavor of herbs and spices, and maybe some banana and lychee.

Swallow:
The finish has a short burst of heat at first and then mellows quickly to a very well rounded flavor. All flavors and scents of before are present, but in a rather mellow and gentle way. That is not to say it doesn’t last, since the finish is not short at all.

I’ve just looked up that a bottle of this is only £ 30 or so, and only € 31 in The Netherlands. Admitted, this is only half a liter but still for what you’re getting this is some bloody fine whisky! The complexity is just enough to keep you busy if you want, but it’s not a too demanding dram, which means it suits all purposes in my book.

I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a lot of Clynelish in this, or maybe Glenmorangie because of the sweet vanilla and candle wax. Luckily, I really enjoy booze from both these distilleries!

Highly recommended. Who said whisky has to be expensive for it to be good? I love finding little gems like this! It restores some faith in the industry 😉

Great King St. Glasgow Blend, 43%, Compass Box. Available from whiskysite.nl for € 30.99

Full disclosure: Compass Box sent me a sample of this for reviewing purposes. Thanks a million!

Posted in - Blended Whisky, Compass Box | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Kildalton 2007, 54.4% – Archives (Fishes of Samoa)

One of the side effects of ordering at Whiskybase is that they generally and generously toss in a couple of wee samples of their Archives range. This means some new things to taste every once in a while, from a series that somehow gets overlooked by me. Maybe too easily, since there have been some really good whiskies in it.

This Kildalton came with a recent order (the GlenDronach 1993 of course) and since I felt like reviewing a dram on this dreary and grey afternoon, I grabbed it. Since it’s called Kildalton I’d guess this is an Ardbeg, just by the name of it.

It’s a young one, but surprisingly after only seven years in oak it it already down to 54.4%. Most whiskies four times its age are showing more oomph, but I guess this is still at cask strength. There doesn’t seem to be much reason for watering it down slightly.

Kildalton 7yo. Image from Whiskybase

Kildalton 7yo. Image from Whiskybase

Sniff:
I still say it’s Ardbeg. The peat is thick with lots of earthy undertones and withered heather. There’s a slight salinity and grassiness just overpowering a gentle layer of sugar, barley and oak. Some hints of vanilla custard too.

Sip:
The palate is very fierce with heaps of salt and pepper, a sharp herbaceousness and the sweetness is pushed far back. Especially the pepper sticks out. This will sure wake you up, even if it pummels your palate into submission. Grass, heather, oaky spices, sugar and maybe a hint of cheesecake? Slightly thicker than I expected.

Swallow:
The finish is much more gentle although it has a slight burn in your throat. I get hints of Riesling with a slight sparkle. Later it turns slightly more sweet with sugar and a more Muscatel like thickness. The peat is back with a dry earthy kind.

When you know you’re trying a young Islay whisky, you expect lots of peat, burn and grassy notes. This one delivers on all fronts. It’s quite fierce but pretty good, probably because of the fierceness. It does dull the senses somewhat, but that was exactly what I was looking for. It does make you feel alive, even though your tongue feels like an ashtray after drinking it.

So, in that aspect, a very well done and well picked whisky! It doesn’t offer too much complexity, but it sure offers fun. Good stuff!

Also, a single cask from Islay at cask strength is not a bad deal when it’s € 67.50!

Kildalton 2007, 54.4% – Archives (Fishes of Samoa). Available at Whiskybase for € 67.50

Full disclosure: This sample was given to at no cost by the guys at Whiskybase. Thanks!

Posted in Ardbeg, Undisclosed | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Old Crow, 43% +/- 1970

I reviewed an Old Crow bourbon last year, which was pretty awesome but had a crappy cap. This one is a lot better, from a regular bottle. The Italian tax label suggests that this was bottled between 1969 and 1971, but Italians being Italians, there may be a small diversion.

Why is this? The label first:

  • It has a completely red Italian tax label
  • There are three stars on the label
  • The contents are described as ‘3/4 litri’ and not 0.75 or so

These indicators make you pretty able to pinpoint the point of import into Italy. I investigated this a while ago for an article in our club magazine and between some of the Malt Maniacs and Max Righi of Whisky Antique this was what I was able to find out.

Then, why this might still be wrong because Italy:

I’ve heard from the same sources and other writings on the interwebz that Italy wasn’t overly strict on the use of the tax labels in those days. So, if there were any labels left over they might have used them to after 1971, or if the bottles sat in bonded warehouses before being cleared through customs for some years they might have been importer earlier. So, 1970 is a guess at best.

What’s certain is that it’s old. Very old. The bottle that is. The whisky is most likely just about six years old as that seems to have been the age of the Old Crow bourbons. These Old Crows were the cream of the crop back in the day according to many knowledgeable people. When the distillery closed and Beam took over the brand quickly lost their quality earmark and moved to the bottom shelf. I’ve tried a more recent version at De Whiskykoning a couple years ago and it was undrinkable.

Note: I don’t have anything against Beam. They make some kick-ass bourbon. Many of you will know my love of some of their small batch series (Booker’s, and especially Knob Creek. I’m not a fan of Basil Haydens’)

This one then.

Sniff:
Glue comes off the glass if you let it breathe, but upon closed inspection I still get that, but with burnt oak, maize and sugary syrup. There’s cinnamon and ginger behind all that for some bite. It’s pretty sharp for a 43% bourbon.

Sip:
The palate is gentle at first but quickly comes up with a lot of chili pepper. There’s quite some sweetness behind it but accompanies by spices. The hot cinnamon and ginger are present, as is some oak and oak bark. The glue is not as prominent as on the nose but it’s still here.

Swallow:
The finish is more typical of bourbon with some spices and quite a lot of sweetness. Corn syrup mostly but also some sappy oak. A hint of charcoal maybe?

Even though still has spent some forty (!) years in glass there’s barely any Old Bottle Effect, and it’s actually a delicious bourbon. It’s a shame the bottle is almost gone by now, and I wish I was more alert for this kind of stuff a couple of years back.

I bought this for some € 30, but bourbon has also gotten really popular in auction sites on this side of the Atlantic, so prices are not what they used to be. I wouldn’t expect to get something like this for under a hundred now. Still, that’s not too bad a deal for a bit of true liquid history.

In short. They made some fine bourbon at Old Crow Distillery back then. This one in particular has held together well in the bottle and has some really intense flavors for something this low in alcohol and not that old either. Great stuff!

Old Crow, 43% +/- 1970 from a 0.75706 liter bottle (some exact labeling there!)

Posted in - American Whiskey, Old Crow | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Caol Ila 30, 1980-2010, 53.3% – Bladnoch Forum

Caol Ila has always been a favorite of mine. There are terrific whiskies from this Islay distillery, but mostly it is because this is the whisky with which my fascination truly kicked off.

I bought my first bottle of Caol Ila 18 at De Whiskykoning after I had gone through some Glenfiddichs and was really blown away by the depth and massive flavor it has. After that I didn’t really collect them, but I was never without Caol Ila. Even now I have quite some of this distillery’s bottling open on my shelf and most of them are pretty awesome.

This 30 year old came out in 2010 and was ridiculously cheap, as was the main USP for the Bladnoch Forum bottlings. At the same time, the first 30 year old Port Askaig was released by The Whisky Exchange. A lot of comparison was done between the two and I believe the general consensus was that the Port Askaig was slightly better, albeit more expensive too.

Back then this THIRTY YEAR OLD Caol Ila cost some 80 quid. Keep in mind that in those days a Pound Sterling was worth as much as a Euro. In those days The Whisky Exchange, Master of Malt and all other British web shops sold massive amounts to Europe since it was very affordable for us to order across the pond. But anyway, 80 euros for a 30 year old whisky. That was some deal.

Oh, on a side note. The Bladnoch Forum has since ceased it’s bottling operation. This has been nicely taken over by The Whisky Broker, who now released very affordable bottlings from all kinds of distilleries, as well as selling casks of spirit. The Whisky Broker is run by Martin Armstrong, the son of (former?) distillery manager Raymond Armstrong of Bladnoch Distillery.

Caol Ila 30. Image from Whiskybase

Caol Ila 30. Image from Whiskybase

Sniff:
It’s warm and smoky, ashy even. Gentle, with lots of fruit. Apples, ripe galia melon. Also the more typical Islay flavors or grass, salt and heather. The typical Caol Ila milkiness is present too.

Sip:
The palate is surprisingly peppery, with smoke, vanilla cream and salt. It’s quite a bit sharper than the nose suggests but there is a lot less oak than you’d expect from a 30 year old. Some wood spices too.

Swallow:
The finish is rather long, dry and spicy. The oak is a little bit more present here and the smoke is toned down a little.

While this might not be the best Caol Ila ever, and it’s even a little simple compared to the older official bottlings and more expensive indies (think Berry’s and such) it’s still a pretty good whisky. It’s showing its age well, without being too woody. The spices and fruit are nicely balanced and the smoke never overpowers the other flavors.

All in all, a rather lovely dram. One that I had kind of forgotten and only a couple of glasses had been gone from the bottle in four years. I’m thinking this might not last too long now.

Caol Ila 30, 1980-2010, 53.3%, Bourbon Hogshead, Bladnoch Forum. Now worth some € 120

Posted in Caol Ila | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Highland Park Sigurd, 43%

Highland Park Sigurd. I initially wanted this bottle because it’s called Sigurd. Sigurd is the Norse base name for Sjoerd, which is rather epic. It means something like ‘Keeper of Victory’.

Rob, the owner of Whiskykoning in Den Bosch, saw my post of this on Facebook and promptly changed this in his line-ups to ‘Highland Park Sjoerd’, and was kind enough to save me dram (Much obliged, Rob, thanks a million).

In the end I didn’t buy it since it is quite a pricey dram and for one that I hadn’t tasted before and it being just at 43% I thought it too big a risk to guess. Now, since I’m able to really try it, I get to see if I’m right.

The reviews I found on the interwebz weren’t overly promising. Some people liked it, some people didn’t. Although, depending on which review you get, even from the same dude, 89 points is translated to ‘good but not great’ or other times ‘great but just short of epic’. I guess it’s a mood thing. That, combined with a deciding factor called price, is the reason I don’t rate my reviews.

The whisky then. It’s from Highland Park’s Warriors series. This is the 243rd series of Norse themed whiskies from Highland Park in the last decade or so, and one that has not been overly popular with the whisky geeks. The range starts (from a budget point of view) in a couple of American oak matured drams, and then another couple of Spanish oak ones. This is the first from the European oak part of the line.

Sniff:
Quite mature, without losing touch with its spirit. Lots of oaky spices, like nutmeg and red cinnamon. Warming with a hint of smoke in the background. Wow. It’s very gentle with some raisins, moss, and wet earth. Very autumnal with even some cigars.

Sip:
Gentle, with a slightly peppery bite. A nice continuance of the nose on the palate. Rather syrupy with a woody, sappy note. Rather specific on the oak. Again the coarseness of the cigar smoke, with wood dust, moss, and spices.

Swallow:
The finish is, as expected, very gentle and mellow. Pretty long lasting with the sappy notes again. The smoke is very rich, but gentle. The wood is present too and pretty strong at that.

This Highland Park surprises me in several ways. One is that it’s not fruity at all. Two is that it’s ridiculously autumnal. Three is that this is not more popular.

I’m slightly confused by the European oak thingy. I guess it’s from a refill cask since the wood influence is vastly different than I’m used to from the more prevalent American oak in whisky. On the other hand, I barely get any sherry influence apart from maybe some bitter raisin twigs in a woody kind of way. I did find some raisins on the palate, but not what I’d expect from sherry matured Highland Park.

I only had a single glass left in the bottle I got, but bloody hell it’s good. It’s really gentle and timid because of the 43%, but the flavors are really good and exactly to my liking. I didn’t miss the fruit at all, but the gentle spices with the sappy and mossy notes make for a proper autumnal dram.

It’s like a forest in a glass, with some bonfire in the distance. I removed it from my wishlist since I only wanted it because of the name, but now I want it for more reasons. This goes right back on the wish list!

Highland Park Sigurd, 43%, available at a lot of shops but De Whiskykoning sells it for € 152. Prices vary heavily.

Thanks a million for the sample, Rob!

Posted in Highland Park | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Lost Blend, 46% – Compass Box

Compass Box is a very interesting company from London that produces an impressive array of impressive whiskies. Some blends and some blended malts. Some of their whiskies are okay but still worth the money you spend on them. Most of the whiskies, however, are ridiculously good. Especially if you take the price in account, like the Great King Street blended whisky.

Some months ago I received a couple of samples from them (reviewed here, here and here) and they have since released two new whiskies. One is this The Lost Blend, another is an addition to the Great King Street range. I’ll review that second one shortly and I’m really excited about it. The first and still available Great King Street was awesome (and Clynelish heavy, as far as I know).

The Lost Blend is a whisky to celebrate their first blended malt named Eulethera. That whisky saw the light of day in 2001 and was retired in 2004 because they couldn’t get a key component anymore. Ten years later they felt the need to celebrate. They have tried their best to recreate the same style. Unfortunately I can’t comment on that as I wasn’t drinking whisky in those days.

Sniff:
Light at the start with quite some oak influence. I would say refill American oak. Some charcoal, ginger but also apple and a hint of smoke. After a while it becomes slightly more crisp with pear, galia melon and chalk.

Sip:
The palate is lightly spicy with some bite. Even some bitterness. Apple, pear, pineapple so quite some fruit. Even some white pepper for spiciness. Oak and charcoal, but also some added sweetness that reminds me of the cream icing on carrot cake.

Swallow:
The finish is rich and spicy with a hint of vanilla and ginger. Some barley, oak. Not overly long.

This is a highly consistent whisky that is very, very tasty. Dangerously drinkable, I would say. The flavors are all there and the fruitiness with a backdrop of oak and spices is gorgeous.

I think this one also has quite some age to it and it’s a prime example of what some good bourbon casks can do to quality spirit. This also demonstrates why I generally love American oak, even though I’ve recently bought quite some sherried whiskies.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this went quickly (as most of Compass Box’ limited releases do) and since I generally wait quite a while before I review a whisky, it could also have sold out by now. The General, for example, went lightning fast. Bad marketing tactics in waiting too long, I know.

The Lost Blend, 46%, Compass Box, available at Master of Malt for € 97

Posted in - Blended Malt, Compass Box | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Delirium Café Amsterdam

Right. Yesterday a couple of colleagues and I went on the piss. On a school night. That was not such a good idea, since I was already massively sleep deprived, and last night my body was mostly processing alcohol instead getting actual rest.

Anyway, it was a team outing. We got to spend some non-work time with each other and even though we see each other an average of some 32 hours per week, we still had loads of bullshit to yap about. With the level of roaring laughter we produced it might have been smart to go on a quiet week night after all.

The Delirium Café then. It’s a branded place, owned by some canal tour operator in Amsterdam, but run by people who seem to know their brews. The menu proudly shows some 500 beers in stock, mostly bottled but about 20 on tap or so.

The fair is simple with the choice not ranging wider than a kind of meat with chips (the meat being schnitzel or a burger) and a vegetarian dish. Burgers were had by all. They’re good.

The location of the place is both good and crap. Good because I generally like those off the beaten path places that you have to know about to find. Somehow that reminds me of some of the best bars I’ve been able to visit. On the other hand it would be nice to be somewhat closer to the train station, especially since the main walking route to the station is under some heavy construction and we had to skip some borders between buses and cars to get to where we wanted to be.

The beer menu is what I found a bit of a letdown. Prices for beers are fairly high, which might be acceptable in Amsterdam but I would have expected some beers to be more sensibly priced. Also, and this is my biggest issue with the beer selection, the 500 beers they promote is bullshit. We had five rounds with seven people, and some drank lager. But, where things went wrong is that about half the craft beers we ordered weren’t available.

We didn’t order too rare stuff. Mostly stuff you can get in most beer shops. None of the too fancy beers like Westvleteren or other limited releases. Just regular stuff. And HALF wasn’t there. Apart from the menu being vast, if your beer wasn’t there you had to start finding one to your liking again on it. That takes a lot of time, especially since the categories used were nonsense. Since when is Orval a blond beer?

Anyway, the night was incredible fun. We had a great time with colleagues and some ex-colleagues who decided to show up too. The beer we ended up having were good too. The food was good and the place is nice. What’s to complain, right?

Posted in - Bar, - Beer | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment