Bruichladdich 1992, 23yo, 50.5% – Cadenhead’s Cask Ends

In early April I’m going on a road trips with some friends to Islay. On the way back we’re going to have an afternoon in Campbeltown. We’ve booked the Cadenhead’s Warehouse tasting! It’s insane how much I’m looking forward to that, not in the least because of the Cask Ends bottles I’ve been able to try (here, here and here).

Add to that, that most of the whiskies I’ve had or seen from this series have been from distilleries I really like (especially Highland Park and Bruichladdich). I am sooooo looking forward to that. Also to Islay, and the time with friends, and Islay Ales and so much more, of course.

Anyway, a properly aged Bruichladdich, at a decent strength, from a bourbon cask. All is good in whisky land. Or at least, that is what I was hoping for.


Random Cadenhead’s Cask Ends bottle.

Lots of barley and a prominent, but gentle oakiness. Light, and very crisp, in a ‘forest in spring’ kind of way. Tobacco leaves, oak, malt and tad dry. A very light whiff of vanilla crumble, with shortbread.

Full and dry, with white pepper and oak. Autumn leaves, tobacco and some baking spices. Rich, with custard.

Consistent with the palate, albeit a bit more focused on the spices. Oak and vanilla, baking sices. Tobacco and autumn leaves.

Well, it is a bit more focused on the vanilla and custard flavors that I expected, or hoped for. However, with the autumn leaves, tobacco and baking spices, it is simply delicious. There’s still quite a lot to be gotten and the vanilla never gets overpowering in any way.

I’m glad this kind of older Bruichladdich is still out there, especially from Cadenhead’s it seems. I love this style and you really taste a whisky that shows its age in a good way. There’s not much that’s not to love.


Bruichladdich 1992, 23yo, 50.5%, Cadenhead’s Cask Ends. Obviously it’s gone now.

Posted in Bruichladdich | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Springbank 21, 1995-2016, Fresh Sherry Pipe, 49% – Starkicker, Austria

Recently I got a little bit confused about this bottling, since I thought it was from 2017 instead of 2016. That led to some strange comments from me on Facebook and some confusing discussions about it afterwards. Apparently I am so old now that a year means nothing anymore. Or at least it passes really fast.

As with the previous Starkicker bottling that was reviewed here, it’s bottled by an Austrian whisky club. That’s all I know about it.

But again, 21 year old Springbank. Can’t really go wrong with that.

It’s very funky sherry like you’d expect from Springbank. Slightly bitter with something I described as ‘pickled dates’. Furniture polish, old oak and walnuts.

The palate is very dry and very nutty. Slightly funky again, with lightly bitter and earthy notes. Lots of oak, European oak, I guess. Dates and apricot.

The finish is dry and earthy again, and exactly like the palate.

By now, and with all the awesome Springbank reviews I did in January, I have gotten to a state that a 21 year old Springbank like this is no longer very surprising.

I’m getting rather spoiled, so to say. Especially since this one didn’t really make an imperssion, but it is a very good one. Much, much better than that strange sherry matured, port finished concoction that was the other Starkicker bottling.

This one is an extremely funky sherry cask If you don’t really like those, but prefer the clean sherry style of, for example, old Glen Grant and such, I guess this one isn’t for you. I really dig those earthy, nutty and funky flavors to a certain level. This one is on the brink of being too funky, but does it *just* right for me.


Springbank 21, 1995-2016, Fresh Sherry, 49% – Starkicker, Austria. Available in Austria for € 245,00

Posted in Springbank | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Caperdonich 39, 1977-2017, 50.4% – Cadenhead’s 175th Anniversary

Well, there’s no mistaking this being from a sherry cask. It’s a butt too, so a more proper sherry cask as well. No information about the kind of oak is given though.

Last year Cadenhead’s, the rather awesome bottler of liquid gold, celebrated their 175th anniversary. With it came a plethora of interesting bottlings, of which I obtained exactly none. I tried to do a bottle share with the bottles that came to the Netherlands, but they were sooooo expensive by then, that I passed.

The biggest problem for/with Cadenhead’s is that they are really expensive outside of the UK. This one went for, I believe, 360 quid in the UK, which translated to some 400 euros back then. In The Netherlands it went for 700 euros. A difference too big to overcome, for several reasons.

Anyway, I managed to get my hands on a sample of this thanks to a UK based bottle share club I’m in. And, now that it’s all gone, I am sooooo happy I got my hands on a sample.


Image from Whiskybase

The nose starts with very smooth and fruity sherry. Lots of oak, but in a way that it supports the other aromas instead of trying to trump them. There’s dates and figs, with some dry sherry. Cold brew coffee with steamed milk. Somehow it also reminds me of St. George’s NOLA Coffee Liqueur. Slightly foresty with moss and ferns. Plums and peaches later on.

The palate is slightly tingling, so it suggests a bit more alcohol than I’d expect at 39 years old (no ABV on the sample bottle and I didn’t look it up). Dry, warming and gently oaky. Hints of dry spices and a very light bitterness. Sweet citrus with blood orange, sherry and loads of other fruits, mostly dates and peaches.

The finish starts with a full and intense hit of sherry, with loads of fruit. A slight bitterness, with oaky and foresty notes. Very complex and long with plums, dates and figs.

To summarize: If I had properly reviewed this last year, it would have been my whisky of the year.

I’m still trying to find my way with ratings, especially in the 84-88 zone, but apparently that also goes for the 91 and up area of whisky points. This, however, sits at a comfortable 94 points for me, without a shadow of a doubt. What a stunning whisky.

The complexity is stunning. The depth and layeredness (a parfait, not an onion, for you Shrek lovers) is stunning. The combination of the sherry and the forest like notes remind me of (although not quite similar) the best Karuizawa and sherried Hakushu whiskies I’ve had. It’s amazing, believe me.


Caperdonich 39, 1977-2017, 50.4%, Cadenhead’s 175th Anniversary. Available in Denmark for 675 euros, if you manage to get one.

Posted in Caperdonich | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Clynelish 1997-2017, 55.8% – Archives (Fishes of Samoa)

This was THE bottling for The Whiskybase Gathering last November. For some reason I decided not to go in 2016, the first time it was held. I decided to correct that last November and had a blast. The festival itself is insane and I heard numerous references to “Limburg an der Maas”.

Before the festival started you could get your hands on a bottle, if you were keen on carrying it around all afternoon, which I didn’t mind. Luckily so, since they sold out very quickly and I heard some people missing out on a bottle during the festival. Maybe they were able to get their hands on one after, since the proprietors of Whiskybase held a few back for in the shop on the following Monday.

Anyway… Clynelish. 1997. Cask strength. What can go wrong?


Image from Whiskybase

It’s waxy Clynelish from the moment you pour a glass. No intense sniffing required to get that note! Lots of caramel too, but also peaches and nectarine. Honey and beeswax. A rather creamy Clynelish, with the caramel it reminds me of Caramac bars.

The palate is rather sharp, and a lot more crisp than the nose made me expect. Both fresh and stewed apple. Some dryness from the cask, with resin and beeswax. Rich and full.

The finish is dry at first, but the richness takes over after. More oak than before, and more like the nose in regards to there being quite a lot of caramel, with grilled peaches.

Well, apparenlty not a lot can go wrong with 1997 Clynelish. When the 1996 and 1997 vintages started coming out a few years ago, you sometimes found one that was just a lot of oomph with not enough mellowing, and flavor from the cask to back it all up. That period seems to have passed and this one is glorious.

If you like Clynelish, this does everything you want it to do. The only remark I have with this, and that’s not even really about this one, is that The Ultimate put out a 1997 one in the same month that cost less than half of this one, which is a bit peculiar.

But, I doubt it is as good as this, because not much is. Insanely tasty. I wish I hadn’t bottle shared it!


Clynelish 1997-2017, Bourbon Hogshead 12355, 55.8%, Archives – Fishes of Samoa

Posted in Clynelish | Leave a comment

Springbank Local Bere Barley 11yo, 53.1%

I’m a tad late in reviewing this, about a year or so. This 11 year old Local Barley release is Springbank’s second release of the five promised bottlings. The first being the 16 year old and the third is a 10 year old that came out in December.

The most identifying about this whisky is that it’s made with Bere barley. Bere is an ancient species of barley. Bere is old type of barley that was supposedly brought to Scotland by the Vikings. The word is old Scots for barley and is a type that grows in a short season of long days of sunlight, which makes it acclimated to the north of Scotland. Currently it is only grown on Orkney, Caithness and some other locations.

It is no longer used often, since the barley only has a low sugar yield, and therefore alcohol yield. Also, newer strains are much more drought and disease restistant, which makes it far more profitable to grow different strains.

The last couple of years it has experienced some sort of revival with the immense boom in whisky popularity, and the distilleries’ search to stand out from the crowd. Arran, Bruichladdich and Springbank have all released some Bere barley whiskies.

Anyway, this is Springbank’s edition. I expect there will be some more in the not too distant future. Of course, because of the gimmicky-ness of the whisky, it wasn’t cheap. Currently, it is somehow still available for some 125 euros.


Image from Whiskybase

On the nose the barley gets a lot of attention, with some malt sugar too. Quite grain whisky like, to be honest, but with more depth, especially considering the age. It’s quite crisp, with a ‘snow’ like scent. Some apple chutney, coconut and pear peels. After a while I get a whiff of vanilla custard and sawdust.

The palate is dry and rather intense. Tingling, with hints of oak and apple, some grain whisky likeness again. Slightly oily, like olive oil and a tinge of salt.

The finish mellows quickly, but stays rather rich. It’s crisp and dry, with lots of grain, apple and oak. Lightly spicy with a whiff of coconut.

Well, someone who says that the barley is of minor influence on the flavor of the whisky is an idiot. This is so different from any other Springbank that has come out over the years, it’s ridiculous. What I also find interesting is that this single malt of 11 years old tastes like a 25 year old Grain whisky, but with slightly more depth and dimensions.

This, of course, means I really like it. I do prefer the heavier style of Springbank found in the other Local Barley releases, but this is far from bad too. And an interesting diversion from what they normally do.

Having said that, if you keep in mind that the 10 year old from December is more or less the same price as this 11 year old, I would suggest going for the 10 year old. I find that a more impressive and memorable whisky than this. But, as said, this ain’t bad either.


Springbank Local Bere Barley 11yo, 53.1%, available at The Old Pipe for € 124,95

Posted in Springbank | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Springbank 100 Proof, 10yo, 57% – OB for Gall & Gall

A little while ago a friend of mine bottle shared his bottle of this old Springbank 100 Proof. It was bottled in 2005 for the Dutch market, and more specifically for Dutch bottle shop chain Gall & Gall. As far as I know Gall & Gall has focused more and more on the big brands over the years and has far less specific whiskies like this. At least, I can’t for the life of me remember when I ever saw something interesting and fairly priced in this chain of shops.

Anyway, it was a nice bottle share and I thought it smart to get my hands on a sample so I could continue my (slightly broken) series of Springbank reviews. I know I loved the old Springbank 100 Proofs, which are now replaced by the equally lovely (albeit slightly different) Springbank 12 Cask Strength series.


Image from Whiskybase

The nose is rather strong and very ‘old fashioned’. It focuses on old barley, hay and some flint. There’s a whiff of smoke that comes off as slightly industrial. A rather pungent dram, but in a very good way.

The palate is dry and rough. Almost gritty, with hints of malt sugar, oak and some heat from the alcohol. Barley, flint, apple and hay.

The finish has a note of apple peels, with oak and barley. It’s rather rich and well balanced. Very classical.

I am a bit of a Springbank fanboy, although far from the biggest fan out there. This is the kind of Springbank that made me fall in love with the brand a decade ago. It’s strong, no nonsense whisky, with a very classical approach to it. By that I mean it’s not an ‘engineered’ whisky, or one with fancy usage of casks. It showcases Springbank as a working museum, more or less.

It’s a highly enjoyable dram, and one that I wouldn’t mind having more of. However, this being bottled over a decade ago, you’re not going to find this outside of auctions or the secondary market. According to Whiskybase, this is going for about € 165, but that price might be outdated.


Springbank 100 Proof, 10yo, bottled in 2005, 57%, OB for Gall & Gall.

Posted in Springbank | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Kilchoman 2007, 10yo, Sherry cask, 58.5% – The Whisky Exchange Exclusive

The first non-Springbank review of the year! I’ve not been blogging as much as I’d like, but let’s just hope to remedy that soon.

Earlier this week I got a package from The Whisky Exchange containing a sample of this new Kilchoman, exclusively bottled for them. It’s a 10 year old sherry matured Kilchoman, from a single butt (there’s 600 bottles, so it must be a butt, right?).

Generally, Kilchoman from either a sherry or bourbon cask is amazing, and this one has a rather decent age to it, especially for a Kilchoman. Based on Whiskybase, I can only find one 11 year old, but everything else is much younger. So one of the older Kilchomans, from a sherry butt, at cask strength. From one of the more trustworthy bottlers (by that I mean, their general level of quality if very good).

There’s quite a lot of smoke at first, with the smoke being slightly fatty and barbecue like. Charred bacon. Some oloroso sherry (I think it’s oloroso, at least), with peach. It’s also rather coastal. Salty, briny and even slightly fishy. Barbecued fish, maybe?

The palate is on the sharp side, which isn’t strange with the ABV over 58%. Again, the barbecue smoke is persent, with some oak in the background. Peach, tar, hemp rope and a lot of sherry. In the background of this all, there’s a slightly creamy mouthfeel (after you’ve gotten used to the high ABV).

The finish sticks to the smoke notes for a long time, but is slightly more earhty than before. Warming, with barbecue and the bark you get on good ribs. A long finish, with fruity sherry and slightly drying hints of coastal/harbor flavors (tar and rope and salt).

Well, this is good. Very, very good. An absolutely gorgeous Kilchoman with lots of interesting notes. The coastal notes and the rather peaty character of the spirit combine very well with the fruity intensity of the sherry cask. It’s a very ballsy whisky with a lot of punchy flavors, at a high ABV, so it might not be for everyone, but I sure love it!

It’s currently available at The Whisky Exchange for £125, which seems fair for a whisky of this caliber, in the current market.


Kilchoman 2007, 10yo, Sherry butt 401/2007, 58.5%, The Whisky Exchange Exclusive.

Thanks to TWE for sending a sample!

Posted in Kilchoman | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment